Warning: file_get_contents(/data/phpspider/zhask/data//catemap/4/r/70.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 167

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/tag.function.php on line 1116

Notice: Undefined index: in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 180

Warning: array_chunk() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 181
R 数字向量和数据表的索引_R_Data.table - Fatal编程技术网

R 数字向量和数据表的索引

R 数字向量和数据表的索引,r,data.table,R,Data.table,将以下向量与每个数字的索引一起放入data.table的最佳方法是什么 nVector <- c("20 37", "38 23", "39 48", "45 76", "65 44", "86 95 80") nVector为什么不干脆: data.table(v1 = nVector)[, index := .I][, list(unlist(strsplit(v1, " "))), by = index] ## index V1 ## 1: 1 20 ## 2:

将以下向量与每个数字的索引一起放入data.table的最佳方法是什么

nVector <- c("20 37", "38 23", "39 48", "45 76", "65 44", "86 95 80")
nVector为什么不干脆:

data.table(v1 = nVector)[, index := .I][, list(unlist(strsplit(v1, " "))), by = index]
##     index V1
##  1:     1 20
##  2:     1 37
##  3:     2 38
##  4:     2 23
##  5:     3 39
##  6:     3 48
##  7:     4 45
##  8:     4 76
##  9:     5 65
## 10:     5 44
## 11:     6 86
## 12:     6 95
## 13:     6 80

或者,您可以创建如下函数(使用函数更方便重用——如果只是一次性问题,则不需要):


更新 由于性能是考虑数据大小的一个问题,您可能希望使用
fun
方法,手动创建“data.table”

以下是更大版本的向量的一些计时:

NVector <- rep(nVector, 10000)
length(NVector)
# [1] 60000

f1 <- function(invec) {
  data.table(v1 = invec)[, index := .I][
    , list(unlist(strsplit(v1, " ", TRUE))), by = index]
} 

f2 <- function(invec) {
  cSplit(data.table(v1 = invec)[, index := .I], 
         "v1", sep = " ", direction = "long")
} 

library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(fun(NVector), f1(NVector), f2(NVector), times = 50)
# Unit: milliseconds
#          expr       min        lq      mean    median        uq       max neval
#  fun(NVector)  13.26559  13.70738  15.89918  14.12573  15.11083  50.84675    50
#   f1(NVector) 196.95570 207.60004 223.74729 212.49649 224.78725 378.51007    50
#   f2(NVector) 167.38512 176.16370 196.28389 183.96098 202.00187 412.71760    50
以下是新功能:

## like `fun`, but using `stri_split_fixed`
fun_stringi <- function(invec) {
  x <- stri_split_fixed(invec, " ")
  data.table(index = rep(seq_along(x), lengths(x)), V1 = unlist(x, use.names = FALSE))
}

## A base R alternative
f3 <- function(invec) stack(setNames(strsplit(invec, " ", TRUE), seq_along(invec)))

## A tidyverse approach
f4 <- function(invec) {
  data_frame(ind = seq_along(invec), 
             val = stri_split_fixed(invec, " ")) %>% 
    unnest()
} 
##喜欢'fun',但使用'stri#u split#u固定`

fun_stringi同意Ananda的答案很好,但这里有一个更为粗野的forcish方法,使用
stringr
包和data.frames进行未来的推断

foo = data.frame(V1 = matrix(nVector, ncol = 1))
foo = data.frame(str_split_fixed(foo$V1, " ", 3))

bar = cbind(id = rownames(foo), foo)
bar = melt(bar, id.vars = "id")
bar = bar[order(bar$id),]
bar = bar[bar$value != "",-2]

  ## id value
  ##  1    20
  ##  1    37
  ##  2    38
  ##  2    23
  ##  3    39
  ##  3    48
  ##  4    45
  ##  4    76
  ##  5    65
  ##  5    44
  ##  6    86
  ##  6    95
  ##  6    80

@Nancy我想提到的是,为了解释预分配的listAnanda的
data.table
解决方案非常好,但仅供将来参考,我想指出,对于这样的任务,无论您是否使用
data.table
,都不需要循环。例如,要创建索引向量,您可以执行
idx=rep(1:length(nVector)、sapply(strsplit(nVector,split=”“),length))
。这充分利用了R中的许多函数是矢量化的这一事实,这意味着它们只需对函数进行一次调用即可对向量的每个元素进行操作。@eipi10。。。要改进您的建议,请使用
length
而不是
sapply(…,length)
。快多了……谢谢@AnandaMahto。很高兴知道
长度
。啊,但你的方式仍然会在code高尔夫中获胜。或者:
库(splitstackshape);最后,当提出问题的人给出了一个合理的方法时,我们不能总是忽略它,但我们期望更有效的代码来解决更大的问题。例如,在这里的回答中,您遇到了一个问题,您硬编码了要与
stri\u split\u fixed
一起使用的分割数。当他们表示他们的平均项目长度在160个项目范围内时,可能不是一个好主意;-)不管怎样,继续给我时间。我们在这里可以直言不讳,但当我们相互了解时,也会非常友好……@Ananda一点也不粗鲁。我很高兴了解并感谢您的反馈!我也倾向于从我作为一个用户想要什么的角度来处理这样的问题,如果我找到了答案。有时“最佳”答案更难理解,用不同的方式来看待它会有所帮助。。。也许是一些更有经验的人使用的方法。不值得接受的答案,但不一定是无用的。
NVector <- rep(nVector, 10000)
length(NVector)
# [1] 60000

f1 <- function(invec) {
  data.table(v1 = invec)[, index := .I][
    , list(unlist(strsplit(v1, " ", TRUE))), by = index]
} 

f2 <- function(invec) {
  cSplit(data.table(v1 = invec)[, index := .I], 
         "v1", sep = " ", direction = "long")
} 

library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(fun(NVector), f1(NVector), f2(NVector), times = 50)
# Unit: milliseconds
#          expr       min        lq      mean    median        uq       max neval
#  fun(NVector)  13.26559  13.70738  15.89918  14.12573  15.11083  50.84675    50
#   f1(NVector) 196.95570 207.60004 223.74729 212.49649 224.78725 378.51007    50
#   f2(NVector) 167.38512 176.16370 196.28389 183.96098 202.00187 412.71760    50
library(stringi)
set.seed(2)
NVec2 <- vapply(sample(20, 60000, TRUE), 
                function(x) paste(stri_rand_strings(x, 5, "[0-9]"), collapse = " "), 
                character(1L))

length(NVec2)
# [1] 60000
## like `fun`, but using `stri_split_fixed`
fun_stringi <- function(invec) {
  x <- stri_split_fixed(invec, " ")
  data.table(index = rep(seq_along(x), lengths(x)), V1 = unlist(x, use.names = FALSE))
}

## A base R alternative
f3 <- function(invec) stack(setNames(strsplit(invec, " ", TRUE), seq_along(invec)))

## A tidyverse approach
f4 <- function(invec) {
  data_frame(ind = seq_along(invec), 
             val = stri_split_fixed(invec, " ")) %>% 
    unnest()
} 
library(microbenchmark)
res <- microbenchmark(base = fun(NVec2), stringi = fun_stringi(NVec2),
                      data_table = f1(NVec2), splitstackshape = f2(NVec2), 
                      base_alt = f3(NVec2), tidyverse = f4(NVec2), times = 50)
res
# Unit: milliseconds
#             expr      min       lq     mean   median       uq      max neval
#             base 162.6149 174.7311 204.0177 187.3446 213.7267 443.8357    50
#          stringi 146.8655 157.6717 187.1125 168.5383 192.1952 394.1169    50
#       data_table 360.0788 382.9118 427.2276 396.0421 418.1821 598.3754    50
#  splitstackshape 542.8882 578.6317 619.9677 598.5113 626.5734 901.9400    50
#         base_alt 259.2847 293.7944 325.6021 310.7322 339.1613 492.4644    50
#        tidyverse 500.1571 519.4765 545.4757 534.1167 549.4756 713.3711    50
library(stringi)
set.seed(2)
NVec3 <- vapply(sample(100:200, 125000, TRUE), 
                function(x) paste(stri_rand_strings(x, 5, "[0-9]"), collapse = " "), 
                character(1L))

system.time({out <- f2(NVec3)})
#   user  system elapsed 
#  20.89    0.03   20.94 

## Similar to your actual data
length(NVec3)
# [1] 125000
nrow(out)
# [1] 18767938

res <- microbenchmark(base = fun(NVec3), stringi = fun_stringi(NVec3),
                      data_table = f1(NVec3), base_alt = f3(NVec3), 
                      tidyverse = f4(NVec3), times = 20)
res
## Unit: seconds
##        expr      min       lq     mean   median       uq      max neval
##        base 4.967281 5.606208 5.983120 5.978414 6.345823 7.189997    20
##     stringi 4.888080 5.292926 5.811898 5.728464 6.091029 7.923210    20
##  data_table 5.625772 5.861431 6.244174 6.092079 6.420082 7.698534    20
##    base_alt 4.635496 5.015382 5.564661 5.486531 6.090838 7.034357    20
##   tidyverse 5.634781 6.186927 6.717203 6.613003 7.198013 8.154297    20

autoplot(res, log = FALSE)
foo = data.frame(V1 = matrix(nVector, ncol = 1))
foo = data.frame(str_split_fixed(foo$V1, " ", 3))

bar = cbind(id = rownames(foo), foo)
bar = melt(bar, id.vars = "id")
bar = bar[order(bar$id),]
bar = bar[bar$value != "",-2]

  ## id value
  ##  1    20
  ##  1    37
  ##  2    38
  ##  2    23
  ##  3    39
  ##  3    48
  ##  4    45
  ##  4    76
  ##  5    65
  ##  5    44
  ##  6    86
  ##  6    95
  ##  6    80