Warning: file_get_contents(/data/phpspider/zhask/data//catemap/0/backbone.js/2.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 167

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/tag.function.php on line 1116

Notice: Undefined index: in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 180

Warning: array_chunk() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 181
Backbone.js 嵌套主干.js集合的更好解决方案_Backbone.js_Nested Attributes - Fatal编程技术网

Backbone.js 嵌套主干.js集合的更好解决方案

Backbone.js 嵌套主干.js集合的更好解决方案,backbone.js,nested-attributes,Backbone.js,Nested Attributes,我的许多主干模型通常处理嵌套模型和集合,到目前为止,我使用了默认值、解析和toJSON手动组合来实现嵌套: ACME.Supplier = Backbone.Model.extend({ defaults: function() { return { contacts: new ACME.Contacts(), tags: new ACME.Tags(), attachments: new ACME.

我的许多主干模型通常处理嵌套模型和集合,到目前为止,我使用了
默认值
解析
toJSON
手动组合来实现嵌套:

ACME.Supplier = Backbone.Model.extend({
    defaults: function() {
        return {
            contacts: new ACME.Contacts(),
            tags: new ACME.Tags(),
            attachments: new ACME.Attachments()
        };
    },

    parse: function(res) {
        if (res.contacts) res.contacts = new ACME.Contacts(res.contacts);
        if (res.tags) res.tags = new ACME.Tags(res.tags);
        if (res.attachments) res.attachments = new ACME.Attachments(res.attachments);

        return res;
    }
});

ACME.Tag = Backbone.Model.extend({
    toJSON: function() {
        return _.pick(this.attributes, 'id', 'name', 'type');
    }
});
我已经看过了一些插件,它们基本上与上面做的相同,但是控制更少,样板更多,所以我想知道是否有人有一个更优雅的解决方案来解决这个常见的Backbone.js问题


编辑:我最终采用了以下方法:

ACME.Supplier = Backbone.Model.extend({
    initialize: function(options) {
        this.tags = new ACME.Tags(options.tags);
    },

    parse: function(res) {
        res.tags && this.tags.reset(res.tags);

        return res;
    }
});

ACME.Tag = Backbone.Model.extend({
    toJSON: function() {
        return _.pick(this.attributes, 'id', 'name', 'type');
    }
});

值得注意的是,后来我发现您需要通过
选项
对象将嵌套模型/集合数据从构造函数传递到嵌套模型的构造函数。

我认为您的方法没有任何问题

IMHO的
Model.parse()
方法如果用于此:将被覆盖,以防特殊的解析行为需要

我唯一想改变的是这样的事情:

if (res.tags) res.tags = new ACME.Tags(res.tags);
为此:

if (res.tags) this.tags.reset(res.tags);
由于您已经有一个
ACME.Tags
collection的实例,我将重用它


另外,我不太喜欢
默认值
实现,我习惯于在
Model.initialize()
中进行这种初始化,但我认为这是一个品味问题。

I'v发现,使用这种方法,供应商的toJSON函数将过时,因此最好从它的,这是孩子们的数据

ACME.Supplier = Backbone.Model.extend({
    initialize: function(options) {
        this.tags = new ACME.Tags(options.tags);
    },

    parse: function(res) {
        res.tags && this.tags.reset(res.tags);

        return res;
    },

    toJSON: function({
        return _.extend(
            _.pick(this.attributes, 'id', 'attr1', 'attr2'), {
            tags: this.tags.toJSON(),
        });
    })

}))

我们不想添加另一个框架来实现这一点,所以我们将其抽象到一个基本模型类中。 下面是您如何声明和使用它():

它同样适用于
set
toJSON

下面是
BaseModel

window.app.Model.BaseModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
  constructor: function () {
    if (this.nestedTypes) {
      this.checkNestedTypes();
    }

    Backbone.Model.apply(this, arguments);
  },

  set: function (key, val, options) {
    var attrs;

    /* jshint -W116 */
    /* jshint -W030 */
    // Code below taken from Backbone 1.0 to allow different parameter styles
    if (key == null) return this;
    if (typeof key === 'object') {
      attrs = key;
      options = val;
    } else {
      (attrs = {})[key] = val;
    }
    options || (options = {});
    // Code above taken from Backbone 1.0 to allow different parameter styles
    /* jshint +W116 */
    /* jshint +W030 */

    // What we're trying to do here is to instantiate Backbone models and collections
    // with types defined in this.nestedTypes, and use them instead of plain objects in attrs.

    if (this.nestedTypes) {
      attrs = this.mapAttributes(attrs, this.deserializeAttribute);
    }

    return Backbone.Model.prototype.set.call(this, attrs, options);
  },

  toJSON: function () {
    var json = Backbone.Model.prototype.toJSON.apply(this, arguments);

    if (this.nestedTypes) {
      json = this.mapAttributes(json, this.serializeAttribute);
    }

    return json;
  },

  mapAttributes: function (attrs, transform) {
    transform = _.bind(transform, this);
    var result = {};

    _.each(attrs, function (val, key) {
      result[key] = transform(val, key);
    }, this);

    return result;
  },

  serializeAttribute: function (val, key) {
    var NestedType = this.nestedTypes[key];
    if (!NestedType) {
      return val;
    }

    if (_.isNull(val) || _.isUndefined(val)) {
      return val;
    }

    return val.toJSON();
  },

  deserializeAttribute: function (val, key) {
    var NestedType = this.nestedTypes[key];
    if (!NestedType) {
      return val;
    }

    var isCollection = this.isTypeASubtypeOf(NestedType, Backbone.Collection),
        child;

    if (val instanceof Backbone.Model || val instanceof Backbone.Collection) {
      child = val;
    } else if (!isCollection && (_.isNull(val) || _.isUndefined(val))) {
      child = null;
    } else {
      child = new NestedType(val);
    }

    var prevChild = this.get(key);

    // Return existing model if it is equal to child's attributes

    if (!isCollection && child && prevChild && _.isEqual(prevChild.attributes, child.attributes)) {
      return prevChild;
    }

    return child;
  },

  isTypeASubtypeOf: function (DerivedType, BaseType) {
    // Go up the tree, using Backbone's __super__.
    // This is not exactly encouraged by the docs, but I found no other way.

    if (_.isUndefined(DerivedType['__super__'])) {
      return false;
    }

    var ParentType = DerivedType['__super__'].constructor;
    if (ParentType === BaseType) {
      return true;
    }

    return this.isTypeASubtypeOf(ParentType, BaseType);
  },

  checkNestedTypes: function () {
    _.each(this.nestedTypes, function (val, key) {
      if (!_.isFunction(val)) {
        console.log('Not a function:', val);
        throw new Error('Invalid nestedTypes declaration for key ' + key + ': expected a function');
      }
    });
  },
}

面对同样的问题,我会这样做(下面的代码是TypeScript编译器的输出,所以有点冗长):

然后我可以简单地重写fieldToType方法来定义我的字段类型:

PendingAssignmentOffer.prototype.fieldToType = function () {
    return {
        'creator': User,
        'task_templates': TaskTemplateModel,
        'users': User,
        'school_classes': SchoolClass
    };
};

我相信这种方法是唯一不用使用插件或类似工具的方法,谢谢。
  var Model = (function (_super) {
    __extends(Model, _super);
    function Model() {
        _super.apply(this, arguments);
    }
    Model.prototype.fieldToType = function () {
        return {};
    };

    Model.prototype.parse = function (response, options) {
        _.each(this.fieldToType(), function (type, field) {
            if (response[field]) {
                if (_.isArray(response[field])) {
                    response[field] = _.map(response[field], function (value) {
                        return new type(value, { parse: true });
                    });
                } else {
                    response[field] = new type(response[field], { parse: true });
                }
            }
        });
        return _super.prototype.parse.call(this, response, options);
    };
    Model.prototype.toJSON = function () {
        var j = _super.prototype.toJSON.call(this);
        _.each(this.fieldToType(), function (type, field) {
            if (j[field]) {
                if (_.isArray(j[field])) {
                    j[field] = _.map(j[field], function (value) {
                        return value.toJSON();
                    });
                } else {
                    j[field] = j[field].toJSON();
                }
            }
        });
        return j;
    };
    return Model;
})(Backbone.Model);
PendingAssignmentOffer.prototype.fieldToType = function () {
    return {
        'creator': User,
        'task_templates': TaskTemplateModel,
        'users': User,
        'school_classes': SchoolClass
    };
};