Warning: file_get_contents(/data/phpspider/zhask/data//catemap/9/ruby-on-rails-3/4.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 167

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/tag.function.php on line 1116

Notice: Undefined index: in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 180

Warning: array_chunk() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 181
Corda 在集成测试期间解析匿名参与方失败_Corda - Fatal编程技术网

Corda 在集成测试期间解析匿名参与方失败

Corda 在集成测试期间解析匿名参与方失败,corda,Corda,我开发了一个简单的状态“item”,表示卖家将向一群匿名买家出售的物品。我写了流量测试,一切似乎都很顺利。我还想实施集成测试,以确认我的逻辑工作正常。我的流程失败,因为启动的卖方节点无法从其公钥解析买方。我能够在没有自己代码的情况下复制代码。我觉得我错过了注册步骤或其他什么,但是卖家节点可以使用X500名称解析买家节点。我有点困惑,为什么我在通过其公钥解决买方节点时遇到问题 要复制、克隆cordapps kotlin模板并用以下代码替换DriverBasedTest.kt的内容,请运行gradl

我开发了一个简单的状态“item”,表示卖家将向一群匿名买家出售的物品。我写了流量测试,一切似乎都很顺利。我还想实施集成测试,以确认我的逻辑工作正常。我的流程失败,因为启动的卖方节点无法从其公钥解析买方。我能够在没有自己代码的情况下复制代码。我觉得我错过了注册步骤或其他什么,但是卖家节点可以使用X500名称解析买家节点。我有点困惑,为什么我在通过其公钥解决买方节点时遇到问题

要复制、克隆cordapps kotlin模板并用以下代码替换DriverBasedTest.kt的内容,请运行
gradlew integrationTest

import net.corda.core.identity.AbstractParty
import net.corda.core.identity.CordaX500Name
import net.corda.core.utilities.getOrThrow
import net.corda.testing.core.TestIdentity
import net.corda.testing.driver.DriverDSL
import net.corda.testing.driver.DriverParameters
import net.corda.testing.driver.NodeHandle
import net.corda.testing.driver.driver
import net.corda.testing.node.User
import org.junit.Test
import kotlin.test.assertEquals

class AnonymousTest {
    private val seller = TestIdentity(CordaX500Name("Seller", "", "GB"))
    private val buyer = TestIdentity(CordaX500Name("Buyer", "", "US"))

    @Test
    fun `anonymous resolution test`() = withDriver {
        val sellerUser = User("sellerUser", "testPassword1", permissions = setOf("ALL"))
        val buyerUser = User("buyerUser", "testPassword1", permissions = setOf("ALL"))

        val sellerHandle = startNode(providedName = seller.name, rpcUsers = listOf(sellerUser)).getOrThrow()
        startNode(providedName = buyer.name, rpcUsers = listOf(buyerUser)).getOrThrow()
        val resolvedNameBuyerA = sellerHandle.resolveName(buyer.name)
        assertEquals(buyer.name, resolvedNameBuyerA)
        val resolveFromAnonymous = sellerHandle.resolveFromAnonymous(buyer.party.anonymise())
        assertEquals(buyer.name, resolveFromAnonymous)
    }

    // Runs a test inside the Driver DSL, which provides useful functions for starting nodes, etc.
    private fun withDriver(test: DriverDSL.() -> Unit) = driver(
            DriverParameters(isDebug = true, startNodesInProcess = true)
    ) { test() }

    // Makes an RPC call to retrieve another node's name from the network map.
    private fun NodeHandle.resolveName(name: CordaX500Name) = rpc.wellKnownPartyFromX500Name(name)!!.name

    private fun NodeHandle.resolveFromAnonymous(name: AbstractParty) = rpc.wellKnownPartyFromAnonymous(name)!!.name
}
试验结果如下:

kotlin.KotlinNullPointerException
    at com.template.AnonymousTest.resolveFromAnonymous(DriverBasedTest.kt:40)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest.access$resolveFromAnonymous(DriverBasedTest.kt:15)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest$anonymous resolution test$1.invoke(DriverBasedTest.kt:28)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest$anonymous resolution test$1.invoke(DriverBasedTest.kt:15)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest$withDriver$1.invoke(DriverBasedTest.kt:35)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest$withDriver$1.invoke(DriverBasedTest.kt:15)
    at net.corda.testing.node.internal.DriverDSLImplKt.genericDriver(DriverDSLImpl.kt:1289)
    at net.corda.testing.driver.Driver.driver(Driver.kt:197)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest.withDriver(DriverBasedTest.kt:33)
    at com.template.AnonymousTest.anonymous resolution test(DriverBasedTest.kt:20)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
    at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
    at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.runTestClass(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:110)
    at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:58)
    at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:38)
    at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.java:62)
    at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.SuiteTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(SuiteTestClassProcessor.java:51)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
    at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
    at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ContextClassLoaderDispatch.dispatch(ContextClassLoaderDispatch.java:33)
    at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:94)
    at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy2.processTestClass(Unknown Source)
    at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.processTestClass(TestWorker.java:118)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
    at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
    at org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHubBackedObjectConnection$DispatchWrapper.dispatch(MessageHubBackedObjectConnection.java:182)
    at org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHubBackedObjectConnection$DispatchWrapper.dispatch(MessageHubBackedObjectConnection.java:164)
    at org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHub$Handler.run(MessageHub.java:412)
    at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ExecutorPolicy$CatchAndRecordFailures.onExecute(ExecutorPolicy.java:64)
    at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ManagedExecutorImpl$1.run(ManagedExecutorImpl.java:48)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
    at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ThreadFactoryImpl$ManagedThreadRunnable.run(ThreadFactoryImpl.java:56)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

请注意,Corda
TestIdentity
可能会产生误导,因为它们是新的、语义上独立的身份,即使您提供相同的名称


很高兴听到你们都准备好了,穆斯塔法。好运

TestIdentity
使用与节点中同名公钥不匹配的公钥创建标识。这个故事的寓意是TestIdentity不应该用于集成测试。是的,模板代码具有极大的误导性,因为helper函数
startnodes
TestIdentity
作为输入,让我认为输入超过了节点标识。我花了几个小时才明白事实并非如此。