gdb错误:回溯已停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?) 我在ARMV7目标上调试多线程C++应用程序遇到了问题。这个问题出现在两个不同的ARM目标上,我对它们使用了不同的工具链: Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
我已经检查了一些线程,但是(由于最低限度的多线程程序也有同样的问题),看起来我 *没有损坏的堆栈 *虚拟函数或函数指针有任何问题吗 我主要使用的是运行Angstrom Linux 2016.12的目标Toradex Colibri iMX6 问题gdb错误:回溯已停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?) 我在ARMV7目标上调试多线程C++应用程序遇到了问题。这个问题出现在两个不同的ARM目标上,我对它们使用了不同的工具链: Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?),c++,linux,multithreading,gdb,C++,Linux,Multithreading,Gdb,我已经检查了一些线程,但是(由于最低限度的多线程程序也有同样的问题),看起来我 *没有损坏的堆栈 *虚拟函数或函数指针有任何问题吗 我主要使用的是运行Angstrom Linux 2016.12的目标Toradex Colibri iMX6 问题 我构建程序的方式有问题吗 我如何使用gdbserver/gdb有什么问题吗 修复调试器输出需要哪些选项 我通过目标上的gdbserver和主机上的工具链的arm-linux-gnueabihf-gdb进行调试。 任何目标都没有本地的gdb。 我可以
- 我构建程序的方式有问题吗
- 我如何使用
/gdbserver
有什么问题吗gdb
- 修复调试器输出需要哪些选项
gdbserver
和主机上的工具链的arm-linux-gnueabihf-gdb
进行调试。
任何目标都没有本地的gdb
。
我可以为Linux x86构建应用程序,但到目前为止无法在PC上重现该漏洞
软件问题
似乎有两个线程被卡住了,可能是由于两个互斥锁的死锁,或者一个线程试图第二次获得一个互斥锁
(虽然这似乎不太可能,但在我将互斥体配置为递归后,错误出现了;我必须检查该线程中使用的第二个互斥体)
所有其他线程似乎都运行良好
软件构建和调试配置
生成设置:
我正在使用Toradex提供的带有arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++
和
-std=c++11 -Wall -Werror -Wextra -Wno-unused-result -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-format-security -Wno-implicit-fallthrough -Wl,-Map=output.map -ggdb -g3 -fno-inline -O0
我将相同的程序传递给调试器(即目标上的gdbserver
,主机上的arm-linux-gnueabihf-gdb
)
我找不到libstdc++.so.6的调试库
调试结果
调试目标崩溃的简单单线程应用程序:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x76d6cd44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>, private=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
46 /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) thread apply all bt
Thread 6 (Thread 6606.6630):
#0 0x76d832c8 in __setreuid (ruid=8, euid=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setreuid.c:29
#1 0x7efff06c in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 5 (Thread 6606.6629):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 4 (Thread 6606.6628):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 3 (Thread 6606.6627):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 2 (Thread 6606.6626):
#0 __lll_robust_lock_wait (
futex=0x25b950 <namespace_2::a_function()::a_static_member+152>, private=128)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:31
#1 0x00000080 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 (Thread 6606.6606):
#0 0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>,
private=0) at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
#1 0x00000002 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
- 有效,即不报告来自上面的错误消息
(gdb) bt
#0 0x76d6cd44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>, private=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
46 /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) thread apply all bt
Thread 6 (Thread 6606.6630):
#0 0x76d832c8 in __setreuid (ruid=8, euid=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setreuid.c:29
#1 0x7efff06c in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 5 (Thread 6606.6629):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 4 (Thread 6606.6628):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 3 (Thread 6606.6627):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 2 (Thread 6606.6626):
#0 __lll_robust_lock_wait (
futex=0x25b950 <namespace_2::a_function()::a_static_member+152>, private=128)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:31
#1 0x00000080 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 (Thread 6606.6606):
#0 0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>,
private=0) at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
#1 0x00000002 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
在Linux-x86上调试相同的简单多线程应用程序,无论是否存在死锁:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x76d6cd44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>, private=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
46 /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) thread apply all bt
Thread 6 (Thread 6606.6630):
#0 0x76d832c8 in __setreuid (ruid=8, euid=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setreuid.c:29
#1 0x7efff06c in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 5 (Thread 6606.6629):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 4 (Thread 6606.6628):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 3 (Thread 6606.6627):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 2 (Thread 6606.6626):
#0 __lll_robust_lock_wait (
futex=0x25b950 <namespace_2::a_function()::a_static_member+152>, private=128)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:31
#1 0x00000080 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 (Thread 6606.6606):
#0 0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>,
private=0) at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
#1 0x00000002 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
- 工作
(gdb) bt
#0 0x76d6cd44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>, private=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
46 /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) thread apply all bt
Thread 6 (Thread 6606.6630):
#0 0x76d832c8 in __setreuid (ruid=8, euid=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setreuid.c:29
#1 0x7efff06c in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 5 (Thread 6606.6629):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 4 (Thread 6606.6628):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 3 (Thread 6606.6627):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 2 (Thread 6606.6626):
#0 __lll_robust_lock_wait (
futex=0x25b950 <namespace_2::a_function()::a_static_member+152>, private=128)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:31
#1 0x00000080 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 (Thread 6606.6606):
#0 0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>,
private=0) at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
#1 0x00000002 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
- 似乎有效,但到目前为止我们无法复制该错误
(gdb) bt
#0 0x76d6cd44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>, private=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
46 /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) thread apply all bt
Thread 6 (Thread 6606.6630):
#0 0x76d832c8 in __setreuid (ruid=8, euid=0)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setreuid.c:29
#1 0x7efff06c in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 5 (Thread 6606.6629):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 4 (Thread 6606.6628):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 3 (Thread 6606.6627):
#0 0x76d55d44 in uname () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 2 (Thread 6606.6626):
#0 __lll_robust_lock_wait (
futex=0x25b950 <namespace_2::a_function()::a_static_member+152>, private=128)
at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:31
#1 0x00000080 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 (Thread 6606.6606):
#0 0x76f9facc in __lll_robust_lock_wait (futex=0x257b94 <namespace1::function()::su_place+20>,
private=0) at /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
#1 0x00000002 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
线程1收到信号SIGINT,中断。
0x76f9facc处于完全锁定等待状态(futex=0x257b94,private=0)
at/usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
46/usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:没有这样的文件或目录。
(gdb)螺纹应用所有bt
螺纹6(螺纹6606.6630):
#0 0x76d832c8英寸(ruid=8,euid=0)
at/usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setreuid.c:29
#1 0x7efff06c英寸??()
反向跟踪停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?)
螺纹5(螺纹6606.6629):
#在../sysdeps/unix/syscall template.S:84处的uname()中0 0x76d55d44
#1 0x00000000英寸??()
反向跟踪停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?)
螺纹4(螺纹6606.6628):
#在../sysdeps/unix/syscall template.S:84处的uname()中0 0x76d55d44
#1 0x00000000英寸??()
反向跟踪停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?)
螺纹3(螺纹6606.6627):
#在../sysdeps/unix/syscall template.S:84处的uname()中0 0x76d55d44
#1 0x00000000英寸??()
反向跟踪停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?)
螺纹2(螺纹6606.6626):
#0 \u lll\u健壮\u锁定\u等待(
futex=0x25b950,private=128)
at/usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:31
#1 0x00000080英寸??()
反向跟踪停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?)
螺纹1(螺纹6606.6606):
#0 0x76f9facc处于强锁定等待状态(futex=0x257b94,
private=0)at/usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c:46
#1 0x00000002英寸??()
反向跟踪停止:上一帧与此帧相同(堆栈损坏?)
更新
我可以使用软件的PC版本valgrind
找到bug(互斥锁死锁)
然而,这里的问题是关于gdb
的问题,我还不能理解或解决这些问题
然后,我下载了可用于目标/发行版的调试库,并用这些库替换了原始的共享库
(gdb) info sharedlibrary
From To Syms Read Shared Object Library
0x76fcf800 0x76feaa70 Yes /path/to/libs/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
0x76fb9700 0x76fbcd2c Yes /path/to/libs/lib/librt.so.1
0x76f940c0 0x76fa2e0c Yes /path/to/libs/lib/libpthread.so.0
0x76f01630 0x76f72a10 Yes (*) /path/to/libs/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
0x76e14d38 0x76e48028 Yes /path/to/libs/lib/libm.so.6
0x76e041b0 0x76e0e7ec Yes /path/to/libs/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
0x76cd1000 0x76dc2b10 Yes /path/to/libs/lib/libc.so.6
0x7449c96c 0x744a29e4 Yes /path/to/libs/lib/libnss_files.so.2
(*): Shared library is missing debugging information.
这可能是错误的(取决于您所说的“调试库”的确切含义),并且可能导致您的问题。看
作为第一步,我将使用与您在target上使用的库完全相同的库,并检查这是否会改变GDB的行为。您是否尝试过使用内存调试工具,如或类似工具?否-
valgrind
不适用于目标平台。您在x86构建平台上是否有可以运行valgrind的测试套件?如果您可以在主机平台上测试您的程序(在你的问题中)然后从这里开始。即使Valgrind似乎有效,它也可以指出一些只发生在目标系统上的问题。别忘了Valgrind是开源的,可以为一个尚未构建的目标重新构建(而且已经有很多这样的目标)。您看过并尝试过吗?我最初使用的库与目标上的库完全相同-结果更糟。gdb
中的错误消息相同,库中的输出也不太详细。gdbserver
的docu说,您可以在目标上使用剥离的二进制文件,只有在主机上需要带调试的二进制文件信息。我想图书馆也是如此。