scipy.optimize.fsolve';正确的浮点数组';错误

scipy.optimize.fsolve';正确的浮点数组';错误,scipy,root,Scipy,Root,我需要计算一个函数的根,我正在使用scipy.optimize.fsolve。然而,当我调用fsolve时,有时它会输出一个错误,即“函数调用的结果不是正确的浮点数组” 下面是我使用的输入示例: In [45]: guess = linspace(0.1,1.0,11) In [46]: alpha_old = 0.5 In [47]: n_old = 0 In [48]: n_new = 1 In [49]: S0 = 0.9 In [50]: fsolve(alpha_eq,gue

我需要计算一个函数的根,我正在使用scipy.optimize.fsolve。然而,当我调用fsolve时,有时它会输出一个错误,即“函数调用的结果不是正确的浮点数组”

下面是我使用的输入示例:

In [45]: guess = linspace(0.1,1.0,11)

In [46]: alpha_old = 0.5

In [47]: n_old = 0

In [48]: n_new = 1

In [49]: S0 = 0.9

In [50]: fsolve(alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
TypeError: array cannot be safely cast to required type
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
error                                     Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/andres/Documents/UdeA/Proyecto/basis_analysis/<ipython-input-50-f1e9a42ba072> in <module>()
----> 1 fsolve(bb.alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))

/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.pyc in fsolve(func, x0, args, fprime, full_output, col_deriv, xtol, maxfev, band, epsfcn, factor, diag)
    123             maxfev = 200*(n + 1)
    124         retval = _minpack._hybrd(func, x0, args, full_output, xtol,
--> 125                 maxfev, ml, mu, epsfcn, factor, diag)
    126     else:
    127         _check_func('fsolve', 'fprime', Dfun, x0, args, n, (n,n))

error: Result from function call is not a proper array of floats.

In [51]: guess = linspace(0.1,1.0,2)

In [52]: fsolve(alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))
Out[52]: array([ 0.54382423,  1.29716005])

In [53]: guess = linspace(0.1,1.0,3)

In [54]: fsolve(alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))
Out[54]: array([ 0.54382423,  0.54382423,  1.29716005])
(函数linspace、sqrt和factorial从scipy导入)

这是一个函数的曲线图,我试图找到它的根。

在我看来,这似乎是fsolve的一个bug,但我想在报告之前确保我没有犯愚蠢的错误


如果我的代码有问题,请告诉我。谢谢

我修改了您的
重叠
功能,以便进行如下调试:

def overlap(n1,alpha1,n2,alpha2):
    print n1, alpha1, n2, alpha2
    aux1 = sqrt((2.0*alpha1)**(2*n1 + 3)/factorial(2*n1 + 2))
    aux2 = sqrt((2.0*alpha2)**(2*n2 + 3)/factorial(2*n2 + 2))
    ret = aux1 * aux2 * factorial(n1+n2+2) / (alpha1+alpha2)**(n1+n2+3)
    print ret, ret.dtype
    return ret
当我试图重现你的错误时,会发生以下情况:

>>> scipy.optimize.fsolve(alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))
0 0.5 1 [ 0.1   0.19  0.28  0.37  0.46  0.55  0.64  0.73  0.82  0.91  1.  ]
[ 0.11953652  0.34008953  0.54906314  0.71208678  0.82778065  0.90418052
  0.95046505  0.97452352  0.98252708  0.97911263  0.96769965] float64

...

0 0.5 1 [ 0.45613162  0.41366639  0.44818267  0.49222515  0.52879856  0.54371741
  0.50642005  0.28700652 -3.72580492  1.81152096  1.41975621]
[ 0.82368346+0.j          0.77371428+0.j          0.81503304+0.j
  0.85916030+0.j          0.88922137+0.j          0.89992643+0.j
  0.87149667+0.j          0.56353606+0.j          0.00000000+1.21228156j
  0.75791881+0.j          0.86627491+0.j        ] complex128
因此,在求解方程的过程中,将计算负数的平方根,这将导致
complex128
d类型和错误

对于你的函数,如果你只对零感兴趣,我认为如果你把
S0
提高到四次方,你可以去掉
sqrt
s:

def alpha_eq(alpha2,n1,alpha1,n2,S0):
    return overlap(n1,alpha1,n2,alpha2) - S0**4

def overlap(n1,alpha1,n2,alpha2):
    aux1 = (2.0*alpha1)**(2*n1 + 3)/factorial(2*n1 + 2)
    aux2 = (2.0*alpha2)**(2*n2 + 3)/factorial(2*n2 + 2)
    ret = aux1 * aux2 * factorial(n1+n2+2) / (alpha1+alpha2)**(n1+n2+3)
    return ret
现在:

>>> scipy.optimize.fsolve(alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))
array([ 0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,
        0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,
        0.92452239])

您的代码缺少
alpha_old
的定义,因此我们无法复制您的结果。抱歉,alpha_old=0.5谢谢,现在它可以工作了!PS:没有必要将S0提高到四次方,我定义了一个新函数overlap2,它返回重叠的平方(它不调用overlap!),并重新定义了alpha_eq以返回overlap2-S0**2
>>> scipy.optimize.fsolve(alpha_eq,guess,args=(n_old,alpha_old,n_new,S0))
array([ 0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,
        0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,  0.92452239,
        0.92452239])