Sql 如果不存在,则插入两个表的总和
我有一种情况,我想求两个表之间的差的和。问题是第二个表中可能存在一行,然后我想将其作为新行插入 伪Sql 如果不存在,则插入两个表的总和,sql,sql-server-2008,sum,full-outer-join,Sql,Sql Server 2008,Sum,Full Outer Join,我有一种情况,我想求两个表之间的差的和。问题是第二个表中可能存在一行,然后我想将其作为新行插入 伪 SELECT T1.seller, T1.code, T1.amount - T2.amount 请看图片以了解解释 您需要进行一次完整的外部联接,然后进行汇总。如果您只运行内部查询,您将得到每个可能的行组合(在t1中是独占的,在t1和t2中都存在,在t2中是独占的)-然后将其分组并进行求和 SELECT Seller , Code , SUM(Tab1_amt
SELECT T1.seller, T1.code, T1.amount - T2.amount
请看图片以了解解释
您需要进行一次完整的外部联接,然后进行汇总。如果您只运行内部查询,您将得到每个可能的行组合(在t1中是独占的,在t1和t2中都存在,在t2中是独占的)-然后将其分组并进行求和
SELECT Seller ,
Code ,
SUM(Tab1_amt - Tab2_amt) AS Amount
FROM ( SELECT COALESCE(tab1.Seller, tab2.Seller) AS Seller ,
COALESCE(tab1.code, tab2.code) AS Code ,
COALESCE(tab1.amount, 0) AS tab1_amt ,
COALESCE(tab2.amount, 0) AS tab2_amt
FROM tab1
FULL OUTER JOIN tab2 ON tab1.seller = tab2.seller
AND tab1.code = tab2.code
) AS Tbl
GROUP BY Seller ,
Code
请参见我认为您需要一个
完全联接
(除非您确实希望将行插入到第一个表中)
如果确实需要将行插入表1,则需要执行2个操作,首先插入,然后选择:
INSERT Table1 (Seller, Code, Amount)
SELECT t2.Seller, t2.Code, 0 AS Amount
FROM Table2 t2
WHERE NOT EXISTS
( SELECT 1
FROM Table1 t1
WHERE t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0)
);
SELECT t1.Seller,
t1.Code,
t1.Amount - COALESCE(t2.Amount, 0) AS Amount
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN Table2 t2
ON t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0);
编辑
如果每个表中的行不是unqiue,需要求和,则需要在子查询中求和,因为连接将引入交叉连接:
以这些数据为例
Table1
Seller Code Amount
VL 500 10
VL 500 20
Table2
Seller Code Amount
VL 500 30
VL 500 5
当您加入此网站时,您将获得:
t1.Seller t1.Code t1.Amount t2.Seller t2.Code t2.Amount
VL 500 10 VL 500 30
VL 500 10 VL 500 5
VL 500 20 VL 500 30
VL 500 20 VL 500 5
然后,差值之和为-10,而不是-5
SELECT COALESCE(t1.Seller, t2.Seller) AS Seller,
COALESCE(t1.Code, t2.Code) AS Code,
COALESCE(t1.Amount, 0) - COALESCE(t2.Amount, 0) AS Amount
FROM ( SELECT Seller, Code, SUM(Amount) AS Amount
FROM Table1
GROUP BY Seller, Code
) t1
FULL JOIN
( SELECT Seller, Code, SUM(Amount) AS Amount
FROM Table2
GROUP BY Seller, Code
) t2
ON t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0);
编辑2
中的UNION
方法将比完全联接执行得更好:
SELECT Seller, Code, Amount = SUM(Amount)
FROM ( SELECT Seller, Code, Amount
FROM Table1
UNION
SELECT Seller, Code, -Amount
FROM Table2
) t
GROUP BY Seller, Code
像这样的?您没有告诉要插入到“因此tableX”中的表
在表X中插入(卖方、代码、金额)值(T1.seller、T1.code、T1.amount-T2.amount)
从表2中选择计数(*)小于1的计数(*)
请注意,在insert to apply filter之后,将筛选器作为select语句放置
您没有指定所需的sql类型,因此我无法说明这是否有效您使用的是什么DBMS?您尝试过什么?
选择T1.seller,T1.code,(T1.amount-T2.amount)作为T1.ID=T2.ID上的T1内部连接T2的TAmountSum
Im使用SQL2008选择T1.seller,T1.shortcutcode,(T1.amount-T2.amount)作为T1.seller=T2.seller上的表1内部连接表2 T2的总金额,但这会得到重复的行选择distinct T1.seller,T1.shortcutcode,(T1.amount-T2.amount)作为T1.seller=T2.seller上的表1 T1内部联接表2 T2中的总金额
表列是什么?
DECLARE @T1 TABLE(
seller VARCHAR(10),
code VARCHAR(3) NULL,
amount MONEY
)
DECLARE @T2 TABLE(
seller VARCHAR(10),
code VARCHAR(3) NULL,
amount MONEY
)
INSERT INTO @T1 VALUES
('VL',NULL,1),
('VL','317',70005.6)
INSERT INTO @T2 VALUES
('VL',NULL,0.5),
('VL','500',4450)
SELECT seller,code,SUM(amount) [amount] FROM
(
SELECT * FROM @T1
UNION ALL
SELECT seller,code,-amount as amount FROM @T2
) T
GROUP BY seller,code
insert into tableX (seller,code,amount) values (T1.seller, T1.code, T1.amount -T2.amount)
select count(*) from table2 having count(*) < 1
DECLARE @T1 TABLE(
seller VARCHAR(10),
code VARCHAR(3) NULL,
amount MONEY
)
DECLARE @T2 TABLE(
seller VARCHAR(10),
code VARCHAR(3) NULL,
amount MONEY
)
INSERT INTO @T1 VALUES
('VL',NULL,1),
('VL','317',70005.6)
INSERT INTO @T2 VALUES
('VL',NULL,0.5),
('VL','500',4450)
SELECT seller,code,SUM(amount) [amount] FROM
(
SELECT * FROM @T1
UNION ALL
SELECT seller,code,-amount as amount FROM @T2
) T
GROUP BY seller,code