Unit testing 直接用块菌测试以太坊事件的稳定性
在使用javascript测试truffle中的事件日志时,我发现了以下问题:Unit testing 直接用块菌测试以太坊事件的稳定性,unit-testing,events,ethereum,solidity,smartcontracts,Unit Testing,Events,Ethereum,Solidity,Smartcontracts,在使用javascript测试truffle中的事件日志时,我发现了以下问题: 但块菌也支持直接以稳定的形式编写测试。然而,我找不到任何关于如何在solidity中测试事件日志的文档。有人能帮我吗?事件是存储在区块链中的日志。要想获得一项赛事,你需要观看比赛。 固体块菌测试是合同。而合同只是存储代码的以太坊账户。该代码在该帐户收到事务时执行。以太坊合同无法查看链以获取事件日志。因此,稳固性不支持获取事件。 一般说明: 请注意,智能合约无法访问事件。根据设计,活动只能从智能合约外部访问。它们不
但块菌也支持直接以稳定的形式编写测试。然而,我找不到任何关于如何在solidity中测试事件日志的文档。有人能帮我吗?事件是存储在区块链中的日志。要想获得一项赛事,你需要观看比赛。 固体块菌测试是合同。而合同只是存储代码的以太坊账户。该代码在该帐户收到事务时执行。以太坊合同无法查看链以获取事件日志。因此,稳固性不支持获取事件。 一般说明: 请注意,智能合约无法访问事件。根据设计,活动只能从智能合约外部访问。它们不是直接存储在区块链中。这意味着您将无法使用纯固体进行测试 无法从合同中访问日志及其事件数据(甚至不能从创建它们的合同中访问)。 资料来源: 使用truffle works测试事件,只需执行以下步骤: 1) 创建发出事件的简单约定(contracts/EventEmitter.sol): 2) 创建测试合同(test/testanventemitter.sol): 3) 创建测试代码(Test/testaventemitter.js): 4) 运行测试:
$ truffle test
Using network 'development'.
Compiling your contracts...
===========================
> Compiling ./test/TestAnEventEmitter.sol
Contract: EventEmitter
1.1 Basic
contract => 0xeD62E72c2d04Aa385ec764c743219a93ae49e796
✓ 1.1.1 has been created (56ms)
owner => 0xbD004d9048C9b9e5C4B5109c68dd569A65c47CF9
✓ 1.1.2 should emit ConstructorDone event (63ms)
1.2 Check calls of increment()
✓ 1.2.1 first call should increase the counts correctly (142ms)
✓ 1.2.2 second call should increase the counts correctly (160ms)
✓ 1.2.3 third call should increase the counts correctly (156ms)
完整来源(带有package.json等):
有关事件和监视的更多信息:
(免责声明:我是这个项目和博客的作者)考虑使用OpenZeppelin测试助手 以施工期间发出的事件为例: 合同:
//SPDX许可证标识符:MIT
pragma-solidity^0.8.3;
合同测试{
向公众所有人致辞;
事件创建();
构造函数(){
所有者=msg.sender;
emit ContractCreated();
}
}
块菌试验:
const{expectEvent}=require('@openzeppelin/testhelpers');
const TestContract=artifacts.require('Test');
合同(“测试”、职能(账户){
const[所有者]=账户;
const txParams={from:owner};
beforeach(异步函数(){
this.testContract=等待testContract.new(txParams);
});
描述(‘结构’、功能(){
它('初始状态',异步函数(){
expect(等待这个.testContract.owner()).to.equal(owner);
等待expectEvent.inConstruction(this.testContract,“ContractCreated”);
});
});
});
package.json
{
..
“依赖性”:{
“@openzeppelin/test helpers”:“^0.5.10”
}
..
}
您可以在测试中使用Web3。
pragma solidity 0.5.12;
import "truffle/Assert.sol";
import "../contracts/EventEmitter.sol";
contract TestAnEventEmitter {
EventEmitter private eventEmitter;
uint eContracts = 0;
address private owner;
function assertCount() private {
Assert.equal(eventEmitter.getCount(), eContracts, "Unexpected count of created contracts");
}
constructor() public{
eventEmitter = new EventEmitter();
owner = address(this);
}
}
const EventEmitter = artifacts.require("EventEmitter");
const truffleAssert = require('truffle-assertions');
/** Expected number of counter */
var eCount = 0;
/** The Contract's instance */
var eventEmitter;
global.CONTRACT_ADDRESS = '';
async function assertContractCount() {
assert.equal(await eventEmitter.getCount.call(), eCount, "Wrong number of created contracts");
}
contract('EventEmitter', async () => {
before(async () => {
eventEmitter = await EventEmitter.new();
});
describe("1.1 Basic", function () {
it("1.1.1 has been created", async () => {
global.CONTRACT_ADDRESS = eventEmitter.address;
console.log(' contract => ' + global.CONTRACT_ADDRESS);
await assertContractCount();
});
it("1.1.2 should emit ConstructorDone event", async () => {
// Get the hash of the deployment transaction
let txHash = eventEmitter.transactionHash;
// Get the transaction result using truffleAssert
let result = await truffleAssert.createTransactionResult(eventEmitter, txHash);
// Check event
truffleAssert.eventEmitted(result, 'ConstructorDone', (ev) => {
console.log(' owner => ' + ev.owner);
return true;
});
});
});
describe("1.2 Check calls of increment()", function () {
it("1.2.1 first call should increase the counts correctly", async () => {
// Pre-Conditions
await assertContractCount();
// Creation
let tx = await eventEmitter.increment();
eCount++;
// Expected Event
truffleAssert.eventEmitted(tx, 'Counter', (ev) => {
return parseInt(ev.count) === eCount;
});
// Post-Conditions
await assertContractCount();
});
it("1.2.2 second call should increase the counts correctly", async () => {
// Pre-Conditions
await assertContractCount();
// Creation
let tx = await eventEmitter.increment();
eCount++;
// Expected Event
truffleAssert.eventEmitted(tx, 'Counter', (ev) => {
return parseInt(ev.count) === eCount;
});
// Post-Conditions
await assertContractCount();
});
it("1.2.3 third call should increase the counts correctly", async () => {
// Pre-Conditions
await assertContractCount();
// Creation
let tx = await eventEmitter.increment();
eCount++;
// Expected Event
truffleAssert.eventEmitted(tx, 'Counter', (ev) => {
return parseInt(ev.count) === eCount;
});
// Post-Conditions
await assertContractCount();
});
});
});
$ truffle test
Using network 'development'.
Compiling your contracts...
===========================
> Compiling ./test/TestAnEventEmitter.sol
Contract: EventEmitter
1.1 Basic
contract => 0xeD62E72c2d04Aa385ec764c743219a93ae49e796
✓ 1.1.1 has been created (56ms)
owner => 0xbD004d9048C9b9e5C4B5109c68dd569A65c47CF9
✓ 1.1.2 should emit ConstructorDone event (63ms)
1.2 Check calls of increment()
✓ 1.2.1 first call should increase the counts correctly (142ms)
✓ 1.2.2 second call should increase the counts correctly (160ms)
✓ 1.2.3 third call should increase the counts correctly (156ms)