Python autobahn WAMP消息传递协议

Python autobahn WAMP消息传递协议,python,protocols,specifications,autobahn,wamp-protocol,Python,Protocols,Specifications,Autobahn,Wamp Protocol,我正在通过Pythons multiprocessing.pipe传输WAMP协议, 我要重新执行WampCraClientProtocol 问题A:在不明确的情况下: exclude = ['ABCDEFGH001', 'ABCDEFGH002', 'ABCDEFGH003'] eligible = ['ABCDEFGH001', 'ABCDEFGH002', 'ABCDEFGH003'] [TYPE_ID_PUBLISH, topicURI, event, exclude, eligibl


我正在通过Pythons multiprocessing.pipe传输WAMP协议, 我要重新执行WampCraClientProtocol

问题A:在不明确的情况下:

exclude  = ['ABCDEFGH001', 'ABCDEFGH002', 'ABCDEFGH003']
eligible = ['ABCDEFGH001', 'ABCDEFGH002', 'ABCDEFGH003']
[TYPE_ID_PUBLISH, topicURI, event, exclude, eligible]

# Is the exclude or eligible stronger?
# (Can I do following?)

exclude  = set('ABCDEFGH001', 'ABCDEFGH002', 'ABCDEFGH003')
eligible = set('ABCDEFGH001', 'ABCDEFGH002', 'ABCDEFGH003')
eligible -= exclude
[TYPE_ID_PUBLISH, topicURI, event, [], list(eligible)]

问题B:可以用
[self.session\u id]
替换
excludeMe
所有方法吗

[TYPE_ID_PUBLISH, topicURI, event, excludeMe] ==
[TYPE_ID_PUBLISH, topicURI, event, [self.session_id]]


/Aki R.

问题A:该案例并不含糊——任何人都不会收到该消息。逻辑是:(订阅服务器和符合条件的)\Exclude


问题B:两条消息将导致代理的行为相同。

问题A:情况并不含糊-任何人都不会收到消息。逻辑是:(订阅服务器和符合条件的)\Exclude

问题B:两条消息将导致代理的相同行为