Warning: file_get_contents(/data/phpspider/zhask/data//catemap/2/csharp/288.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 167

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/tag.function.php on line 1116

Notice: Undefined index: in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 180

Warning: array_chunk() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 181
C# 初始化具有必须存在的属性的类的最佳方法_C#_Software Design - Fatal编程技术网

C# 初始化具有必须存在的属性的类的最佳方法

C# 初始化具有必须存在的属性的类的最佳方法,c#,software-design,C#,Software Design,示例类 public class Company { public Details Details { get; set; } public List<Employeee> Employees { get; set; } public Company() { } } public class Details { public string Name { get; set; } public string Url { get; se

示例类

public class Company {
    public Details Details { get; set; }
    public List<Employeee> Employees { get; set; }

    public Company() { 
    }
}

public class Details {
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Url { get; set; }

    public Details() {
    }
}
没有细节的公司是没有意义的

我的一个想法是

更改公司构造函数以自动创建新的详细信息 更改详细信息集以确保其未设置为null
这似乎是一个常见的问题,我想知道是否有一个标准的方法来处理它,这将导致可测试类。我不确定要搜索什么。

如果我理解正确,我认为最好的方法是只创建一个以细节作为参数的构造函数

例如:

public class Company
{
    public Details Details { get; set; }
    public List<Employeee> Employees { get; set; }

    public Company(string Name, string Url)
    {
        this.Details = new Details(Name, Url);
    }
    
    public Company(Details Details)
    {
        this.Details = Details;
    }
}

public class Details
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Url { get; set; }

    public Details(string Name, string Url)
    {
        // If the validation fails, throw an error
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Name))
            throw new ArgumentException($"'{nameof(Name)}' cannot be null or empty", nameof(Name));
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Url))
            throw new ArgumentException($"'{nameof(Url)}' cannot be null or empty", nameof(Url));

        this.Name = Name;
        this.Url = Url;
    }
}

为什么不让Company对象的唯一构造函数期望一个Details对象作为参数?这样你就不能在不声明细节的情况下创建一个公司。我认为仍然需要添加一个限制,以防止构造函数和setter中的细节都为空?@Aligma是的,因此//@Aligma添加了一个基本的验证
public class Company
{
    public Details Details { get; set; }
    public List<Employeee> Employees { get; set; }

    public Company(string Name, string Url)
    {
        this.Details = new Details(Name, Url);
    }
    
    public Company(Details Details)
    {
        this.Details = Details;
    }
}

public class Details
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Url { get; set; }

    public Details(string Name, string Url)
    {
        // If the validation fails, throw an error
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Name))
            throw new ArgumentException($"'{nameof(Name)}' cannot be null or empty", nameof(Name));
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Url))
            throw new ArgumentException($"'{nameof(Url)}' cannot be null or empty", nameof(Url));

        this.Name = Name;
        this.Url = Url;
    }
}