Php PDO事务代码警告vs mysqli

所以我的问题是我应该使用PDO还是mysqli。我担心使用PDO，因为下面的警告来自

警告：某些MySQL表类型（存储引擎）不支持事务。当使用不支持事务的表类型编写事务数据库代码时，MySQL将假装事务已成功启动。此外，发出的任何DDL查询都将隐式提交任何挂起的事务

• 这将在未来造成什么样的问题

• 如果我改用mysqli会更好吗？（不确定是否存在相同的问题）

---

我认为这个警告是因为所有类型的mysql

存储引擎都不支持事务。不支持事务的引擎将立即自动提交数据。因此，请检查发动机列表以及它们在工作中的差异

mysql> SHOW ENGINES;
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+
| Engine     | Support | Comment                                                        | Transactions | XA   | Savepoints |
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+
| InnoDB     | YES     | Supports transactions, row-level locking, and foreign keys     | YES          | YES  | YES        |
| MRG_MYISAM | YES     | Collection of identical MyISAM tables                          | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| BLACKHOLE  | YES     | /dev/null storage engine (anything you write to it disappears) | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| CSV        | YES     | CSV storage engine                                             | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| MEMORY     | YES     | Hash based, stored in memory, useful for temporary tables      | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| FEDERATED  | NO      | Federated MySQL storage engine                                 | NULL         | NULL | NULL       |
| ARCHIVE    | YES     | Archive storage engine                                         | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| MyISAM     | DEFAULT | Default engine as of MySQL 3.23 with great performance         | NO           | NO   | NO         |
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+

我认为这个警告是因为所有类型的mysql
存储引擎都不支持事务。不支持事务的引擎将立即自动提交数据。因此，请检查发动机列表以及它们在工作中的差异

mysql> SHOW ENGINES;
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+
| Engine     | Support | Comment                                                        | Transactions | XA   | Savepoints |
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+
| InnoDB     | YES     | Supports transactions, row-level locking, and foreign keys     | YES          | YES  | YES        |
| MRG_MYISAM | YES     | Collection of identical MyISAM tables                          | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| BLACKHOLE  | YES     | /dev/null storage engine (anything you write to it disappears) | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| CSV        | YES     | CSV storage engine                                             | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| MEMORY     | YES     | Hash based, stored in memory, useful for temporary tables      | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| FEDERATED  | NO      | Federated MySQL storage engine                                 | NULL         | NULL | NULL       |
| ARCHIVE    | YES     | Archive storage engine                                         | NO           | NO   | NO         |
| MyISAM     | DEFAULT | Default engine as of MySQL 3.23 with great performance         | NO           | NO   | NO         |
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+

我对数据库不太熟悉，所以如果我把引擎作为默认引擎，应该可以吗？如果你想使用transaction，那么就使用
InnoDB
，否则就使用默认的。我对数据库不太熟悉，所以如果我把引擎作为默认引擎，应该可以吗？如果你想使用transaction，然后使用InnoDB
，否则使用默认值。