Java DynamoDB仅部分更新
我想使用dynamoDBMapper库通过java更新我的DynamoDB。 我所做的是将消息(我想要执行的更新)推送到一个SQS,让我的java代码使用这些消息并更新我的dynamoDB。 我发现,当我使用脚本在短时间内推送150多条消息时,所有的数据都可以使用,但只有DynamoDB中的部分记录被更新。 更新DynamoDB的代码如下:Java DynamoDB仅部分更新,java,amazon-dynamodb,Java,Amazon Dynamodb,我想使用dynamoDBMapper库通过java更新我的DynamoDB。 我所做的是将消息(我想要执行的更新)推送到一个SQS,让我的java代码使用这些消息并更新我的dynamoDB。 我发现,当我使用脚本在短时间内推送150多条消息时,所有的数据都可以使用,但只有DynamoDB中的部分记录被更新。 更新DynamoDB的代码如下: @Service public class PersistenceMessageProcessingServiceImpl implements Persi
@Service
public class PersistenceMessageProcessingServiceImpl implements PersistenceMessageProcessingService{
@Override
public void process(TextMessage textMessage){
String eventData = textMessage.getText();
updateEventStatus(eventData);
}
/*
each input is a caseDetail messages in Event Table
get data, parse data and update relative records partially in dynamodb.
finally check if still any open cases, if not change state of event
*/
private void updateEventStatus(String eventData) throws ParseException, IOException {
RetryUtils retryUtils = new RetryUtils(maxRetries, waitTimeInMilliSeconds, influxService);
SNowResponse serviceNowResponse = parseData(eventData);
EventCaseMap eventCaseMap = eventCaseMapRepository.findBySysId(sysId);
if (eventCaseMap != null) {
Event event = eventRepository.findByEventId(eventCaseMap.getSecurityEventManagerId());
CaseManagementDetails caseManagementDetails = event.getCaseManagementDetails();
Case existingCaseDetails = getCaseByCaseSystemId(caseManagementDetails, sysId);
caseDetails.setCaseStatus('Resolved');
caseDetails.setResolution(serviceNowResponse.getCloseCode());
caseDetails.setResolvedBy("A");
caseDetails.setAssessment(serviceNowResponse.getAssessment());
caseDetails.setResolutionSource("SEM");
retryUtils.run(() -> {
return eventRepository.updateEvent(event); }, RETRY_MEASUREMENT);
}
boolean stillOpen = false;
for(Case existingCase : caseManagementDetails.getCases()){
if(("OPEN").equals(existingCase.getCaseStatus().toString())){
stillOpen = true;
break;
}
}
if(!stillOpen){
event.setState('CLOSED');
}
}
private Case getCaseByCaseSystemId(CaseManagementDetails caseManagementDetails, String sysId) {
Case caseDetails = null;
if (caseManagementDetails != null) {
List<Case> caseList = caseManagementDetails.getCases();
for (Case c : caseList) {
if (c.getCaseSystemId() != null && c.getCaseSystemId().equalsIgnoreCase(sysId)) {
caseDetails = c;
break;
}
}
}
return caseDetails;
}
}
/* EventCaseMap Table in my DynamoDB
data model is like this for EventCaseMap Table:
{
"caseSystemId": "bb9cc488dbf67b40b3d57709af9619f8",
"securityEventManagerId": "756813a4-4e48-4abb-b37e-da00e931583b"
}
*/
@Repository
public class EventCaseMapRepositoryImpl implements EventCaseMapRepository {
@Autowired
DynamoDBMapper dynamoDBMapper;
@Override
public EventCaseMap findBySysId(String sysId) {
EventCaseMap eventCaseMap = new EventCaseMap();
eventCaseMap.setCaseSystemId(sysId);
return dynamoDBMapper.load(eventCaseMap, DynamoDBMapperConfig.ConsistentReads.CONSISTENT.config());
}
}
/*
data model is like this for Event Table:
{
"caseManagementDetails": {
"cases": [
{
"caseId": "SIR0123456",
"caseStatus": "OPEN",
},
{
"caseId": "SIR0654321",
"caseStatus": "OPEN",
},
{
many other cases(about two hundreds).....
}
]
},
"state": "OPEN",
"securityEventManagerId": "756813a4-4e48-4abb-b37e-da00e931583b"
}
*/
@Repository
public class EventRepositoryImpl implements EventRepository {
@Autowired
DynamoDBMapper dynamoDBMapper;
@Override
public Event findByEventId(String eventId) {
Event event = new Event();
event.setSecurityEventManagerId(eventId);
return dynamoDBMapper.load(event, DynamoDBMapperConfig.ConsistentReads.CONSISTENT.config());
}
@Override
public boolean updateEvent(Event event) {
dynamoDBMapper.save(event, DynamoDBMapperConfig.SaveBehavior.UPDATE_SKIP_NULL_ATTRIBUTES.config());
return false;
}
}
{
"number": "SIR0123456",
"state": "Resolved",
"sys_id": "bb9cc488dbf67b40b3d57709af9619f8",
"MessageAttributes": {
"TransactionGuid": {
"Type": "String",
"Value": "093ddb36-626b-4ecc-8943-62e30ffa2e26"
}
}
}
{
"number": "SIR0654321",
"state": "Resolved",
"sys_id": "bb9cc488dbf67b40b3d57709af9619f7",
"MessageAttributes": {
"TransactionGuid": {
"Type": "String",
"Value": "093ddb36-626b-4ecc-8943-62e30ffa2e26"
}
}
}
事件表的输出:
{
"caseManagementDetails": {
"cases": [
{
"caseId": "SIR0123456",
"caseStatus": "RESOLVED",
},
{
"caseId": "SIR0654321",
"caseStatus": "OPEN"
},
{
many other cases(about two hundreds).....
}
]
},
"state": "OPEN",
"securityEventManagerId": "756813a4-4e48-4abb-b37e-da00e931583b"
}
{
"caseManagementDetails": {
"cases": [
{
"caseId": "SIR0123456",
"caseStatus": "RESOLVED",
},
{
"caseId": "SIR0654321",
"caseStatus": "RESOLVED"
},
{
many other cases(about two hundreds).....
}
]
},
"state": "OPEN",
"securityEventManagerId": "756813a4-4e48-4abb-b37e-da00e931583b"
}
事件表的预期输出:
{
"caseManagementDetails": {
"cases": [
{
"caseId": "SIR0123456",
"caseStatus": "RESOLVED",
},
{
"caseId": "SIR0654321",
"caseStatus": "OPEN"
},
{
many other cases(about two hundreds).....
}
]
},
"state": "OPEN",
"securityEventManagerId": "756813a4-4e48-4abb-b37e-da00e931583b"
}
{
"caseManagementDetails": {
"cases": [
{
"caseId": "SIR0123456",
"caseStatus": "RESOLVED",
},
{
"caseId": "SIR0654321",
"caseStatus": "RESOLVED"
},
{
many other cases(about two hundreds).....
}
]
},
"state": "OPEN",
"securityEventManagerId": "756813a4-4e48-4abb-b37e-da00e931583b"
}
我认为问题在于,当DynamoDB持久化数据时,它以多线程方式运行。因此,如果我们在短时间内使用所有这些数据,可能会有一些线程没有完成。因此,我们看到的结果只是最后一个线程的结果,而不是所有线程的结果。EventId似乎是关键。其他是二级索引?@YatiSawhney在事件表中,securityEventManagerId(这就是您所说的EventId)是键。在这个代码段中,还有两个索引,一个是“state”(如图所示),另一个是“findingUniqueID”(未使用)。