Java 以编程方式添加安全方案时,架构将从组件中消失
我最近将Springfox转换为Springdoc openapi,为我的Spring Boot Rest API服务生成openapi 在我添加安全方案之前,一切都很顺利。一旦我这样做了,我的方案就不再出现,并且在SwaggerUI页面上会出现一个错误:Java 以编程方式添加安全方案时,架构将从组件中消失,java,spring-boot,openapi,springdoc,Java,Spring Boot,Openapi,Springdoc,我最近将Springfox转换为Springdoc openapi,为我的Spring Boot Rest API服务生成openapi 在我添加安全方案之前,一切都很顺利。一旦我这样做了,我的方案就不再出现,并且在SwaggerUI页面上会出现一个错误: Could not resolve reference: Could not resolve pointer: /components/schemas/Ping does not exist in document 我正在以编程方式设置配置
Could not resolve reference: Could not resolve pointer: /components/schemas/Ping does not exist in document
我正在以编程方式设置配置,有两个组
我正在使用SpringBootV2.4.0和SpringDocOpenAPI ui v1.5.1
my pom.xml的片段:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
<artifactId>springdoc-openapi-ui</artifactId>
<version>1.5.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
<artifactId>springdoc-openapi-hateoas</artifactId>
<version>1.5.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springdoc</groupId>
<artifactId>springdoc-openapi-security</artifactId>
<version>1.5.1</version>
</dependency>
对于我的v1组,一切都很好。我的模式出现在Swagger UI页面上,我在生成的api文档的components部分看到它们
"components": {
"schemas": {
"ApplicationErrorResponse": {
...
}
},
"Ping": {
...
}
}
}
对于我的v2组,不会生成架构
"components": {
"securitySchemes": {
"Access Token": {
"type": "apiKey",
"name": "Authorization",
"in": "header"
}
}
}
知道为什么在以编程方式将安全方案添加到OpenAPI组件时不会自动扫描和添加我的模式吗?我的配置中是否缺少某些内容
这是我的控制器中的请求映射
@Operation(summary = "Verify API and backend connectivity",
description = "Confirm connectivity to the backend, as well and verify API service is running.")
@OkResponse
@GetMapping(value = API_VERSION_2 + "/ping", produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public ResponseEntity<Ping> getPingV2(HttpServletRequest request) {
我的v1映射的定义与此类似。因此,当仅依赖OpenApiCustomiser创建OpenAPI时,扫描的组件似乎会被忽略,或者至少会被自定义程序中指定的组件覆盖(我也可以通过编程方式添加所有模式,但维护起来会非常麻烦) 将我的配置更改为以下解决了我的问题:
@Bean
public OpenAPI customOpenAPI() {
final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
return new OpenAPI()
.addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName))
.components(new Components().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
.type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
.in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
.name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION)))
.info(apiInfo());
}
@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV1() {
String[] paths = {"/v1/**"};
String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
.group("v1")
.packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
.pathsToMatch(paths)
.addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV1OpenAPI())
.build();
}
@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV2() {
String[] paths = {"/v2/**"};
String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
.group("v2")
.packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
.pathsToMatch(paths)
.addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV2OpenAPI())
.build();
}
public OpenApiCustomiser buildV1OpenAPI() {
return openApi -> openApi.info(openApi.getInfo().version("v1"));
}
public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
return openApi -> openApi.info(openApi.getInfo().version("v2"));
}
// Describe the apis
private Info apiInfo() {
return new Info()
.title("Title")
.description("API Description.");
}
虽然这在技术上也会将授权按钮和安全方案添加到v1组中,但可以忽略它,因为这些API端点无论如何都不安全(内部API,它们应该很快就会消失)
无论如何,这可能是一个更好的解决方案,因为组之间的信息基本相同。您不应该创建新组件,而应该修改它们:
public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
return openApi -> {
openApi.info(apiInfo().version("v2"))
.addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName));
openApi.getComponents().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
.type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
.in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
.name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION));
return openApi;
};
}
@Bean
public OpenAPI customOpenAPI() {
final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
return new OpenAPI()
.addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName))
.components(new Components().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
.type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
.in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
.name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION)))
.info(apiInfo());
}
@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV1() {
String[] paths = {"/v1/**"};
String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
.group("v1")
.packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
.pathsToMatch(paths)
.addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV1OpenAPI())
.build();
}
@Bean
public GroupedOpenApi apiV2() {
String[] paths = {"/v2/**"};
String[] packagesToScan = {"com.test.controller"};
return GroupedOpenApi.builder()
.group("v2")
.packagesToScan(packagesToScan)
.pathsToMatch(paths)
.addOpenApiCustomiser(buildV2OpenAPI())
.build();
}
public OpenApiCustomiser buildV1OpenAPI() {
return openApi -> openApi.info(openApi.getInfo().version("v1"));
}
public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
return openApi -> openApi.info(openApi.getInfo().version("v2"));
}
// Describe the apis
private Info apiInfo() {
return new Info()
.title("Title")
.description("API Description.");
}
public OpenApiCustomiser buildV2OpenAPI() {
final String securitySchemeName = "Access Token";
return openApi -> {
openApi.info(apiInfo().version("v2"))
.addSecurityItem(new SecurityRequirement().addList(securitySchemeName));
openApi.getComponents().addSecuritySchemes(securitySchemeName, new SecurityScheme()
.type(SecurityScheme.Type.APIKEY)
.in(SecurityScheme.In.HEADER)
.name(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION));
return openApi;
};
}