Java 这个本体论形成得好吗?
我试图在这个本体中执行推理。我在本体下面发帖子Java 这个本体论形成得好吗?,java,ontology,owl-api,hermit,Java,Ontology,Owl Api,Hermit,我试图在这个本体中执行推理。我在本体下面发帖子 <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xm
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="C:/Users/Rita/Desktop/parenthood.owl"
xmlns="C:/Users/Rita/Desktop/parenthood.owl#">
<owl:Ontology rdf:about="C:/Users/Rita/Desktop/parenthood.owl"/>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="#has">
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Man"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Son"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Man">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
<rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">This is man</rdfs:comment>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Woman">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
<rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">This is woman</rdfs:comment>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Son">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Man"/>
<rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">This is son</rdfs:comment>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Daughter">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Woman"/>
<rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">This is son</rdfs:comment>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Father">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Man"/>
<owl:equivalentClass>
<owl:Class>
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="#Man"/>
<owl:Class>
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#has"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#Son"/>
</owl:Restriction>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#has"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#Daughter"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:unionOf>
</owl:Class>
</owl:intersectionOf>
</owl:Class>
</owl:equivalentClass>
<rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">This is father</rdfs:comment>
</owl:Class>
<Man rdf:about="#filippo">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#NamedIndividual"/>
<has rdf:resource="#matteo"/>
</Man>
<Son rdf:about="#matteo">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#NamedIndividual"/>
</Son>
</rdf:RDF>
这是男人
这是女人
这是我儿子
这是我儿子
这是我父亲
我希望“菲利波”个人被分配到“父亲”类。这是对的吗?还是本体论形成不良?我使用了OWlAPI 5和hermit作为推理机。我是本体论领域的新手!!请帮忙。
谢谢,Rita本体的rdf:about字段不应该是文件路径,而应该是IRI。然而,本体看起来很可靠,否则本体的rdf:about字段不应该是一个文件路径,而应该是一个IRI。然而,本体论在其他方面似乎得到了很好的证实。