Mysql 选择takes';s越长,添加的联接越多
我有一个问题 其中,8个连接中的每一个单独使用0.0007秒,但当我将它们组合在一起时,查询所需的时间呈指数增长,最终以3秒的查询结束 基本上,我有一种灵活的方式来请求具有附加字段的场地。前三个字段看起来不错,但当我达到7时,我注意到这需要很长时间。 我随机化了附加字段的顺序,但结果表明,添加哪个字段并不重要 无其他字段[0.52毫秒]Mysql 选择takes';s越长,添加的联接越多,mysql,join,Mysql,Join,我有一个问题 其中,8个连接中的每一个单独使用0.0007秒,但当我将它们组合在一起时,查询所需的时间呈指数增长,最终以3秒的查询结束 基本上,我有一种灵活的方式来请求具有附加字段的场地。前三个字段看起来不错,但当我达到7时,我注意到这需要很长时间。 我随机化了附加字段的顺序,但结果表明,添加哪个字段并不重要 无其他字段[0.52毫秒] SELECT `v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPAR
SELECT
`v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags
FROM
`listing_venue` AS `v`
INNER JOIN
`listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id WHERE (v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1)
GROUP BY
`venue_id`
1个附加字段[0.72毫秒]
SELECT
`v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`
FROM
`listing_venue` AS `v`
INNER JOIN
`listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `addressfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue` ON addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id
WHERE
(v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1) AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address')
GROUP BY
`venue_id`
2个附加字段[1.42毫秒]
SELECT `v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`, `address_zhvalue`.`value` AS `address_zh` FROM `listing_venue` AS `v` INNER JOIN `listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `addressfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue` ON addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_zhfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_zhvalue` ON address_zhvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_zhvalue.field_id = address_zhfield.field_id WHERE (v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1) AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address') AND (address_zhfield.field_nm = 'address_zh') GROUP BY `venue_id`
3->1.13毫秒
SELECT `v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`, `address_zhvalue`.`value` AS `address_zh`, `address_nearvalue`.`value` AS `address_near` FROM `listing_venue` AS `v` INNER JOIN `listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `addressfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue` ON addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_zhfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_zhvalue` ON address_zhvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_zhvalue.field_id = address_zhfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_nearfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_nearvalue` ON address_nearvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_nearvalue.field_id = address_nearfield.field_id WHERE (v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1) AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address') AND (address_zhfield.field_nm = 'address_zh') AND (address_nearfield.field_nm = 'address_near') GROUP BY `venue_id`
4->1.94毫秒
SELECT `v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`, `address_zhvalue`.`value` AS `address_zh`, `address_nearvalue`.`value` AS `address_near`, `phone_numbervalue`.`value` AS `phone_number` FROM `listing_venue` AS `v` INNER JOIN `listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `addressfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue` ON addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_zhfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_zhvalue` ON address_zhvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_zhvalue.field_id = address_zhfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_nearfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_nearvalue` ON address_nearvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_nearvalue.field_id = address_nearfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `phone_numberfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `phone_numbervalue` ON phone_numbervalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND phone_numbervalue.field_id = phone_numberfield.field_id WHERE (v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1) AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address') AND (address_zhfield.field_nm = 'address_zh') AND (address_nearfield.field_nm = 'address_near') AND (phone_numberfield.field_nm = 'phone_number') GROUP BY `venue_id`
5->9.7毫秒
SELECT `v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`, `address_zhvalue`.`value` AS `address_zh`, `address_nearvalue`.`value` AS `address_near`, `phone_numbervalue`.`value` AS `phone_number`, `websitevalue`.`value` AS `website` FROM `listing_venue` AS `v` INNER JOIN `listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `addressfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue` ON addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_zhfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_zhvalue` ON address_zhvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_zhvalue.field_id = address_zhfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_nearfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_nearvalue` ON address_nearvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_nearvalue.field_id = address_nearfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `phone_numberfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `phone_numbervalue` ON phone_numbervalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND phone_numbervalue.field_id = phone_numberfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `websitefield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `websitevalue` ON websitevalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND websitevalue.field_id = websitefield.field_id WHERE (v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1) AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address') AND (address_zhfield.field_nm = 'address_zh') AND (address_nearfield.field_nm = 'address_near') AND (phone_numberfield.field_nm = 'phone_number') AND (websitefield.field_nm = 'website') GROUP BY `venue_id`
6->230.52毫秒
SELECT `v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`, `address_zhvalue`.`value` AS `address_zh`, `address_nearvalue`.`value` AS `address_near`, `phone_numbervalue`.`value` AS `phone_number`, `websitevalue`.`value` AS `website`, `price_maxvalue`.`value` AS `price_max` FROM `listing_venue` AS `v` INNER JOIN `listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr` ON vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `addressfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue` ON addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_zhfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_zhvalue` ON address_zhvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_zhvalue.field_id = address_zhfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `address_nearfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_nearvalue` ON address_nearvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_nearvalue.field_id = address_nearfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `phone_numberfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `phone_numbervalue` ON phone_numbervalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND phone_numbervalue.field_id = phone_numberfield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `websitefield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `websitevalue` ON websitevalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND websitevalue.field_id = websitefield.field_id INNER JOIN `listing_field` AS `price_maxfield` LEFT JOIN `listing_venue_field_rel` AS `price_maxvalue` ON price_maxvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND price_maxvalue.field_id = price_maxfield.field_id WHERE (v.venue_id = 79) AND (v.published = 1) AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address') AND (address_zhfield.field_nm = 'address_zh') AND (address_nearfield.field_nm = 'address_near') AND (phone_numberfield.field_nm = 'phone_number') AND (websitefield.field_nm = 'website') AND (price_maxfield.field_nm = 'price_max') GROUP BY `venue_id`
7->3375.29毫秒
SELECT
`v`.`venue_id`, `v`.`venue_nm`, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT vtr.tag_id SEPARATOR ",") tags, `addressvalue`.`value` AS `address`, `address_zhvalue`.`value` AS `address_zh`, `address_nearvalue`.`value` AS `address_near`, `phone_numbervalue`.`value` AS `phone_number`, `websitevalue`.`value` AS `website`, `price_maxvalue`.`value` AS `price_max`, `price_minvalue`.`value` AS `price_min`
FROM
`listing_venue` AS `v`
INNER JOIN
`listing_venue_tag_rel` AS `vtr`
ON
vtr.venue_id = v.venue_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `addressfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `addressvalue`
ON
addressvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND addressvalue.field_id = addressfield.field_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `address_zhfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_zhvalue`
ON
address_zhvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_zhvalue.field_id = address_zhfield.field_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `address_nearfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `address_nearvalue`
ON
address_nearvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND address_nearvalue.field_id = address_nearfield.field_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `phone_numberfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `phone_numbervalue`
ON
phone_numbervalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND phone_numbervalue.field_id = phone_numberfield.field_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `websitefield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `websitevalue`
ON
websitevalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND websitevalue.field_id = websitefield.field_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `price_maxfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `price_maxvalue`
ON
price_maxvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND price_maxvalue.field_id = price_maxfield.field_id
INNER JOIN
`listing_field` AS `price_minfield`
LEFT JOIN
`listing_venue_field_rel` AS `price_minvalue`
ON
price_minvalue.venue_id = v.venue_id AND price_minvalue.field_id = price_minfield.field_id
WHERE
(v.venue_id = 79)
AND (v.published = 1)
AND (addressfield.field_nm = 'address')
AND (address_zhfield.field_nm = 'address_zh')
AND (address_nearfield.field_nm = 'address_near')
AND (phone_numberfield.field_nm = 'phone_number')
AND (websitefield.field_nm = 'website')
AND (price_maxfield.field_nm = 'price_max')
AND (price_minfield.field_nm = 'price_min') GROUP BY `venue_id`
显然,我可以将查询拆分为7个,但我不明白为什么会出现这种奇怪的时间增长
另外,我不确定我使用的联接是否正确。场地可能是空的,这就是为什么我要加入场地的原因
以下是表格结构
listing_field:
field_id | field_nm
listing_venue_field_rel
venue_id | field_id| value
listing_venue
venue_id | venue_nm
说明
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE v const PRIMARY,item_id_UNIQUE PRIMARY 4 const 1
1 SIMPLE addressfield ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where
1 SIMPLE addressvalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE address_zhfield ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where; Using join buffer
1 SIMPLE address_zhvalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE address_nearfield ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where; Using join buffer
1 SIMPLE address_nearvalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE phone_numberfield ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where; Using join buffer
1 SIMPLE phone_numbervalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE websitefield ALL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where; Using join buffer
1 SIMPLE websitevalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE price_maxfield ALL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where; Using join buffer
1 SIMPLE price_maxvalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE price_minfield ALL NULL NULL NULL 7 Using where; Using join buffer
1 SIMPLE price_minvalue ref field_value_venue,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_venue_id,fk_mnc_listing_venue_field_rel_field_id field_value_venue 4 const 6 Using index
1 SIMPLE vtr ref item_tag,fk_venue_id fk_venue_id 4 const 11 Using index
编辑I“索引唯一”字段,将速度降低回7毫秒
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE v const PRIMARY,item_id_UNIQUE PRIMARY 4 const 1
1 SIMPLE addressfield const field_nm,field_nm_2 field_nm 137 const 1 Using index
1 SIMPLE address_zhfield const field_nm,field_nm_2 field_nm 137 const 1 Using index
1 SIMPLE address_nearfield const field_nm,field_nm_2 field_nm 137 const 1 Using index
1 SIMPLE phone_numberfield const field_nm,field_nm_2 field_nm 137 const 1 Using index
1 SIMPLE websitefield const field_nm,field_nm_2 field_nm 137 const 1 Using index
1 SIMPLE price_maxfield const field_nm,field_nm_2 field_nm 137 const 1 Using index
1 SIMPLE addressvalue ref field_value_venue,... field_value_venue 4 const 7 Using index
1 SIMPLE address_zhvalue ref field_value_venue,... field_value_venue 4 const 7 Using index
1 SIMPLE address_nearvalue ref field_value_venue,... field_value_venue 4 const 7 Using index
1 SIMPLE phone_numbervalue ref field_value_venue,... field_value_venue 4 const 7 Using index
1 SIMPLE websitevalue ref field_value_venue,... field_value_venue 4 const 7 Using index
1 SIMPLE price_maxvalue ref field_value_venue,... field_value_venue 4 const 7 Using index
1 SIMPLE vtr ref item_tag,fk_venue_id fk_venue_id 4 const 17 Using index
不过,我确信查询可以再优化一些我认为您可能在这里进行交叉连接 内部联接
列表\字段
为地址\字段
左联接
您没有ON子句,因此其他所有内容都是笛卡尔积,这可能会导致指数级的速度减慢。可能会正确设置查询格式。他们看起来很可怕…+1@astander!Moak,你能把你的查询格式化成几行吗?@astander@lagrandmile我重新格式化了前两个查询,之后只添加了一个额外的查询,但列表字段与场馆表无关,那么我如何才能设置ON呢?事实上,所有内部连接都缺少连接条件,因此表中的每个记录都将连接到所有其他记录,您肯定会看到速度变慢。使用EXPLAIN Select查看发生了什么(将结果张贴在此处)。下面是连接语法(使用连接条件,而不是实际启用)OK。看看解释,如果你取“rows”列,然后将这些值相乘,我认为可能会有250000000000行(1*7*6*7*6*7*6*7*6*7*6*7*7*6*11)需要分析。请看这里,并注意连接类型“ALL”的含义(这很糟糕)。如何将结果减少到更少?如果不了解您要实现的目标,也没有关于数据库的更多信息,我真的不能说,对不起。