Warning: file_get_contents(/data/phpspider/zhask/data//catemap/4/r/67.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 167

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/tag.function.php on line 1116

Notice: Undefined index: in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 180

Warning: array_chunk() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 181
R:X对Y变化的预测值?_R_Random_Intercept_Delta_Baseline - Fatal编程技术网

R:X对Y变化的预测值?

R:X对Y变化的预测值?,r,random,intercept,delta,baseline,R,Random,Intercept,Delta,Baseline,更新:lme4软件包中的lmer功能可能会提供答案。 10名参与者接受了减肥计划,如下所示: mydata<-as.data.frame(matrix(c(140,125,120,115,110,110,110,105,100,90,85,100,140,70,100, 100,140,120,220,190,90,100,120,60,90,110,130,110,120,140,NA,65,110,50,NA,90,120,NA,130, 150,NA,60,NA,45,NA,NA,1

更新:lme4软件包中的lmer功能可能会提供答案。

10名参与者接受了减肥计划,如下所示:

mydata<-as.data.frame(matrix(c(140,125,120,115,110,110,110,105,100,90,85,100,140,70,100,
100,140,120,220,190,90,100,120,60,90,110,130,110,120,140,NA,65,110,50,NA,90,120,NA,130,
150,NA,60,NA,45,NA,NA,110,NA,160,NA),nrow=10,dimnames=list(c(1:10),c("IQ","Weight.year.1"
,"Weight.year.2","Weight.year.3","Weight.year.4"))))

mydata这里没有统计学家,但是你不能把基线权重也放在模型中考虑进去吗?
这就是我想到的,快,脏:

library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)

mydata<-as.data.frame(matrix(c(140,125,120,115,110,110,110,105,100,90,85,100,140,70,100,
                                     100,140,120,220,190,90,100,120,60,90,110,130,110,120,140,NA,65,110,50,NA,90,120,NA,130,
                                     150,NA,60,NA,45,NA,NA,110,NA,160,NA),nrow=10,dimnames=list(c(1:10),c("IQ","Weight.year.1"
                                                                                                                                ,"Weight.year.2","Weight.year.3","Weight.year.4"))))

newdata <- mydata %>%
gather("period", "weight", -IQ) %>%
mutate(period = gsub("Weight.year.", "", period) %>% as.integer()) %>%
full_join(mydata, by = "IQ")

lm( weight ~ IQ + Weight.year.1 + period, data = newdata ) %>% summary()
库(dplyr)
图书馆(tidyr)
mydata%
变异(period=gsub(“Weight.year.”,“”,period)%>%as.integer())%>%
完全联接(mydata,by=“IQ”)
lm(体重~智商+体重.年份.1+期间,数据=新数据)%>%汇总()
这导致:

电话: lm(公式=体重~IQ+体重。年份。1+期间,数据=新数据)

残差: 最小1季度中值3季度最大值 -43.978-14.2480.136 13.100 47.484

系数: 估计标准误差t值Pr(>t)
(截距)150.79400 52.30548 2.883 0.00602** 智商-0.70584 0.39301-1.796 0.07921。
重量。年份。10.45839 0.09481 4.835 1.59e-05***

期间-8.53867 2.97500-2.870 0.00623** 签名。代码:0''0.001''0.01''0.05''0.1''1

剩余标准误差:45自由度时为21.03 (15项观察因缺失而删除) 倍数R平方:0.6019,调整后的R平方:0.5753 F-统计量:3和45 DF上的22.68,p-值:4.286e-09


这里没有统计学家,但是你不能通过将基线权重也放入模型中来考虑基线权重吗?
这就是我想到的,快,脏:

library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)

mydata<-as.data.frame(matrix(c(140,125,120,115,110,110,110,105,100,90,85,100,140,70,100,
                                     100,140,120,220,190,90,100,120,60,90,110,130,110,120,140,NA,65,110,50,NA,90,120,NA,130,
                                     150,NA,60,NA,45,NA,NA,110,NA,160,NA),nrow=10,dimnames=list(c(1:10),c("IQ","Weight.year.1"
                                                                                                                                ,"Weight.year.2","Weight.year.3","Weight.year.4"))))

newdata <- mydata %>%
gather("period", "weight", -IQ) %>%
mutate(period = gsub("Weight.year.", "", period) %>% as.integer()) %>%
full_join(mydata, by = "IQ")

lm( weight ~ IQ + Weight.year.1 + period, data = newdata ) %>% summary()
库(dplyr)
图书馆(tidyr)
mydata%
变异(period=gsub(“Weight.year.”,“”,period)%>%as.integer())%>%
完全联接(mydata,by=“IQ”)
lm(体重~智商+体重.年份.1+期间,数据=新数据)%>%汇总()
这导致:

电话: lm(公式=体重~IQ+体重。年份。1+期间,数据=新数据)

残差: 最小1季度中值3季度最大值 -43.978-14.2480.136 13.100 47.484

系数: 估计标准误差t值Pr(>t)
(截距)150.79400 52.30548 2.883 0.00602** 智商-0.70584 0.39301-1.796 0.07921。
重量。年份。10.45839 0.09481 4.835 1.59e-05***

期间-8.53867 2.97500-2.870 0.00623** 签名。代码:0''0.001''0.01''0.05''0.1''1

剩余标准误差:45自由度时为21.03 (15项观察因缺失而删除) 倍数R平方:0.6019,调整后的R平方:0.5753 F-统计量:3和45 DF上的22.68,p-值:4.286e-09

嗯,这个问题可能(也?)与你的问题有关。然而,如果问题过于R-specific,人们往往会关闭它们。如果你交叉发帖,这是不受欢迎的,但有时在获得答案方面是最好的,请放置相互链接。嗯,这个问题可能(也?)与你有关。然而,如果问题过于R-specific,人们往往会关闭它们。如果你横过帖子,这是不赞成的,但有时在获得答案方面是最好的,请放置相互链接。