什么优先于SBT_OPTS或.sbtopts？

我在文章、博客和其他回答中都看到了这两个问题，但不清楚我应该在我的项目中使用哪一个？

答案在

由于列表中较低的选项具有较高的优先级，我们可以假设

.sbtopts

优先于

SBT\u OPTS

。这很有意义，因为您可以在

.bashrc

中设置

SBT\u OPTS

，并且应该有一种方法可以根据

.sbtopts

提供的每个项目自动覆盖它。

答案在

由于列表中较低的选项具有较高的优先级，我们可以假设

.sbtopts

优先于

SBT\u OPTS

。这很有意义，因为您可以在

.bashrc

中设置

SBT\u OPTS

，并且应该有一种方法可以自动覆盖

.sbtopts

提供的每个项目

  # jvm options and output control
  JAVA_OPTS           environment variable, if unset uses "$default_java_opts"
  .jvmopts            if this file exists in the current directory, its contents
                      are appended to JAVA_OPTS
  SBT_OPTS            environment variable, if unset uses "$default_sbt_opts"
  .sbtopts            if this file exists in the current directory, its contents
                      are prepended to the runner args
  /etc/sbt/sbtopts    if this file exists, it is prepended to the runner args
  -Dkey=val           pass -Dkey=val directly to the java runtime
  -J-X                pass option -X directly to the java runtime
                      (-J is stripped)
  -S-X                add -X to sbt's scalacOptions (-S is stripped)
In the case of duplicated or conflicting options, the order above
shows precedence: JAVA_OPTS lowest, command line options highest.