Android WebView图像太大
下面的HTML无法在Webview中正确显示。巨大的照片和微小的文字？如何解决这个问题？我已经为视口设置了元数据，这有助于文本，但如果有大图像，文本会缩小吗？下面是移动设备中的html，文本仅占屏幕的1/3Android WebView图像太大,android,html,cordova,android-webview,Android,Html,Cordova,Android Webview,下面的HTML无法在Webview中正确显示。巨大的照片和微小的文字？如何解决这个问题？我已经为视口设置了元数据，这有助于文本，但如果有大图像，文本会缩小吗？下面是移动设备中的html，文本仅占屏幕的1/3 福克斯新闻非常善于发现特德·克鲁兹的谎言。 特德·克鲁兹于2016年1月28日在爱荷华州得梅因由福克斯新闻赞助的共和党总统辩论会上发表讲话吉姆·沃森/Getty Images requirejs（[“jquery”]，函数（$）{ 如果（$（窗口）.width（）
福克斯新闻非常善于发现特德·克鲁兹的谎言。
特德·克鲁兹于2016年1月28日在爱荷华州得梅因由福克斯新闻赞助的共和党总统辩论会上发表讲话吉姆·沃森/Getty Images
requirejs（[“jquery”]，函数（$）{
如果（$（窗口）.width（）<640）{
$（“.slate_图像图形”）。宽度（“100%”；
}
});
[！[在此处输入图像描述][1][1]
在周四晚上的共和党总统辩论中，主持人梅根·凯利（Megyn Kelly）谈到了他在2013年参议院移民改革斗争中所扮演的角色。正如斯莱特最近解释的那样，如果你想了解克鲁兹的观点，那场战斗就是一场战斗。凯利向克鲁兹施压，让他说出他当时所说与现在所说之间的差异，迫使他在电视直播中向公众展示他对诚实的看法。不太好看
威尔·萨勒坦为斯莱特写政治、科学、技术和其他东西。他是这本书的作者
凯利向辩论观众展示了四个视频剪辑。在这些剪辑中，克鲁兹在2013年的战斗中发表了演讲，他恳切地呼吁达成妥协，允许无证移民获得参议院正在审议的法案规定的合法身份，但不包括公民身份。妥协的关键是克鲁兹提出的一项修正案。克鲁兹现在否认他曾经支持合法化。以下是他如何试图解释视频剪辑，以及交流中透露的有关他的信息
1。他撒谎。Kelly的第一段视频取自2013年5月9日Cruz在参议院司法委员会的演讲，显示他说，“。”第二段视频取自他2013年5月21日在参议院司法委员会的演讲，显示他说，“。”第三段视频取自2013年5月31日Cruz的演讲，显示他说：“我相信，如果我提出的修正案获得通过，该法案将获得通过。我提出这些修正案的目的是找到一个反映共同立场并解决问题的解决方案。”
克鲁兹和周四辩论会上的其他人一样，在凯利播放这些片段时观看了这些片段。每一个片段都显示出他在为法案辩护。但在一份声明中，他否认自己这样做：
凯利：[你]试图推销它，说“我希望法案通过。”
克鲁兹：但不，不。我说的是“我希望移民改革通过。”
凯利：你也说了法案。
克鲁兹：我没有说我希望法案通过。我向你保证。
这是克鲁兹试图在这个问题上蒙蔽福克斯新闻采访者的唯一理由。布雷特·拜尔在12月16日对克鲁兹的指责与凯利的几乎相同，克鲁兹在12月18日也试图这样做。上周，克鲁兹试图这样做。斯蒂芬诺普洛斯指出，在2013年4月哥伦比亚广播公司的一次采访中，克鲁兹曾表示“可能会有妥协”关于无证移民的法律地位。克鲁兹告诉Stephanopoulos，他的妥协提议与法律地位无关。那就是。2013年采访中的问题是：“你会如何处理1100万非法移民？”克鲁兹的回答是，“我认为，如果一条通往公民身份的道路被取消，可能会在这方面达成妥协。”
2.他通过技术细节来判断自己是否诚实，而不是通过他所说的话的简单含义。在辩论中，凯利对克鲁兹说，“你提出了一项修正案。这将允许合法化，但不允许公民身份。”克鲁兹摇头否认。他指出，他的修正案“没有说一句关于合法化的话。”从技术上讲，这是真的：政府没有使用“允许”或“法律地位”这两个词。但克鲁兹使用了。2013年5月21日，他指出，该法案的支持者明确寻求“为非法入境者提供法律地位，让他们走出阴影。这项修正案将允许这种情况发生。”2013年6月4日，他发布了一份声明，称他的修正案“将允许非法移民从阴影中走出来，合法工作。”就像比尔·克林顿（Bill Clinton）将自己的真实性押在“is的意义”上一样，克鲁兹现在将自己的诚实押在对“允许”一词的创造性重新解释上
3.他是一名演员。在播放克鲁兹呼吁妥协的视频后，凯利问他，“这都是一种行为吗？很有说服力。”在辩论后的采访中，她告诉他：“对于普通人来说，当你试图出售它时，看到表演，说‘我希望法案通过’似乎很奇怪。”凯利说，她不认为克鲁兹在2016年就其2013年的动机撒谎。但在这种情况下，他在2013年所说的话，正如她所说的，是演戏。在这种情况下，演戏只是撒谎的一个更好的词。正如参议员兰德·保罗（Rand Paul）在周四的交流中所指出的：
我当时在那里，我看到了（移民）辩论。我看到特德·克鲁兹说，“我们将取消公民资格，然后法案将通过，我支持法案。”……但特别具有侮辱性的是，他是说“你支持特赦”的国王除了特德·克鲁兹，所有人都支持特赦。但这是错误的，这是真实性的问题。
4.他误导了所有人，而不仅仅是他的敌人。在辩论后的采访中，凯利指出，2013年，克鲁兹模仿了支持合法化的流行语。她告诉他：“你说的是‘走出阴影’的人。这好像是在演戏。”克鲁兹告诉凯利，他这样做是为了玩弄自由党
<html>
<head>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user- scalable=yes">
</head>
<body>
<h1>Fox News is getting really good at spotting Ted Cruz’s lies.</h1>
<div class="newbody body parsys"><span>
</span><div class="parbase image slate_image section"><span>
</span><div class=""><span>
</span><figure class="image inline "> <img src_tag_name="src" title="Ted Cruz " alt="Ted Cruz " src="http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/160129_pol_ted-cruz_1024.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg"> <figcaption class="caption"><span>Ted Cruz speaks during the Republican presidential debate sponsored by Fox News in Des Moines, Iowa, on Jan. 28, 2016.</span></figcaption> <p class="credit">Jim Watson/Getty Images</p>
</figure><span>
</span></div><span>
</span>
<script>
requirejs(["jquery"], function($) {
if ($(window).width() < 640) {
$(".slate_image figure").width("100%");
}
});
</script>
<span>
</span></div><span>
[![enter image description here][1]][1]</span><div class="text text-1 parbase section"><span>
</span><p>In Thursday night’s Republican presidential debate, moderator Megyn Kelly <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/28/7th-republican-debate-transcript-annotated-who-said-what-and-what-it-meant/">grilled Sen. Ted Cruz</a> about his role in the Senate’s 2013 fight over immigration reform. As <strong><em>Slate</em></strong> recently explained, that fight is <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/the_definitive_timeline_of_what_ted_cruz_said_and_did_in_the_2013_immigration.html?wpsrc=sp_all_article_storypromo">an excellent episode to study</a> if you want to understand Cruz’s <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/01/ted_cruz_may_be_the_most_gifted_liar_ever_to_run_for_president.html">peculiar views about truth and deception</a>. By pressing Cruz about discrepancies between what he said then and what he says now, Kelly forced him to show the public, on live television, how he thinks about honesty. It wasn’t pretty.</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><section class="about-the-author fancy inline with-head">
<div class="author-bio"><p>Will Saletan writes about politics, science, technology, and other stuff for <b><i>Slate</i></b>. He’s the author of <i><a target="_blank" href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0520243366" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Bearing Right</a></i>.<a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0520243366" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><i><br></i></a></p><span>
</span></div>
</section><span> </span><!-- /.about-the-author --><span>
</span><div class="text-2 text parbase section"><span>
</span><p>Kelly showed the debate audience four video clips. In the clips, taken from Cruz’s speeches during the 2013 fight, he earnestly appealed for a compromise that would allow undocumented immigrants to earn legal status—as prescribed by a bill the Senate was considering—but not citizenship. The key to the compromise was an amendment, offered by Cruz, that would have <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Cruz3-(DAV13373).pdf">closed the path to citizenship</a>. Cruz now denies that he ever supported legalization. Here’s how he tried to explain the video clips, and what the exchange revealed about him.</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><span>
</span><div class="text-3 text parbase section"><span>
</span><p><strong>1. He lies.</strong> Kelly’s first clip, taken from Cruz’s speech in the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 9, 2013, showed him saying, “<a href="http://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=140">I don’t want this bill to be voted down</a>.” The second clip, taken from his speech to the committee on May 21, 2013, showed him saying, “<a href="http://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=128">If [my] amendment were to pass, the chances of this bill passing into law would increase dramatically</a>.” The third clip, taken from Cruz’s <a href="http://web.princeton.edu/sites/jmadison/calendar/flash/Cruz.html">remarks at Princeton University</a> on May 31, 2013, showed him saying: “I believe if the amendments I introduced were adopted, that the bill would pass. And my effort in introducing them was to find a solution that reflected common ground and that fixed the problem.”</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text parbase text-4 section"><span>
</span><p>Cruz, like everyone else at Thursday’s debate, watched these clips as Kelly played them. Each clip showed him pleading for the bill. But in an <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUV_HiSxwfA">interview after the debate</a>, he denied that he had done so:</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text parbase text-5 section"><span>
</span><blockquote><strong>Kelly:</strong> [You were] trying to sell it, saying, “I want the bill to pass.”<strong><br>Cruz:</strong> But—no, no. What I said is, “I want <em>immigration reform</em> to pass.”<strong><br>Kelly:</strong> You also said the bill.<strong><br>Cruz:</strong> I didn’t say I want the bill to pass. I promise you.</blockquote><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text text-6 parbase section"><span>
</span><p>This is the <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/01/ted_cruz_may_be_the_most_gifted_liar_ever_to_run_for_president.html">third time in two months</a> that Cruz has tried to hoodwink a Fox News interviewer on this subject. Bret Baier’s rebuke to Cruz on Dec. 16—“<a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/4664479751001/sen-ted-cruz-this-is-a-nation-at-war/">You said the bill</a>”—is almost identical to Kelly’s, and Cruz also attempted to <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/4667702262001/cruz-obama-hillary-dems-out-of-touch-with-american-people/">put one past Greta Van Susteren</a> on Dec. 18. Last week, Cruz tried to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ted-cruz-donald-trumps-immigration-policy-amounts-amnesty/story?id=36431907">fool ABC’s George Stephanopoulos</a>. Stephanopoulos noted that in an April 2013 CBS interview, Cruz had said “there could be a compromise” on legal status for undocumented immigrants. Cruz told Stephanopoulos that his compromise offer wasn’t about legal status. That’s <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf2J6OhUHcQ">not true</a>. The question in the 2013 interview was: “What would you do with the 11 million people who are here illegally?” And Cruz’s answer was, “I think there could probably be a compromise on that, if a path to citizenship was taken off the table.”</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text parbase text-7 section"><span>
</span><p><strong>2. He judges his own honesty by technicalities, not by the plain meaning of his words. </strong>During the debate, Kelly told Cruz, “You proposed an amendment. It would have allowed for legalization but not citizenship.” Cruz shook his head in denial. He pointed out that his amendment “didn’t say a word about legalization.” Technically, that’s true: The <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Cruz3-(DAV13373).pdf">amendment</a> didn’t use the words <em>allow</em> or <em>legal status</em>. But Cruz did. On May 21, 2013, he <a href="http://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=128">told the Judiciary Committee</a> that the bill’s proponents explicitly sought “to provide a legal status for those who are here illegally, to be out of the shadows. This amendment would allow that to happen.” On June 4, 2013, he issued a <a href="https://www.scribd.com/doc/145879453/Letter-from-Sens-Cruz-Sessions-Lee-Grassley-Voicing-Concerns-with-S-744">letter</a> that said his amendment “would have allowed immigrants here illegally to obtain legal status—to come out of the shadows and work legally.” Like Bill Clinton, who famously staked his truthfulness on “the meaning of <em>is</em>,” Cruz now stakes his honesty on a creative reinterpretation of the word <em>allow</em>.</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text parbase text-8 section"><span>
</span><p><strong>3. He’s an actor.</strong> After showing the videos of Cruz’s appeals for compromise, Kelly asked him, “Was that all an act? It was pretty convincing.” In the post-debate interview, she told him: “It just seems weird for the average person to see, like, the acting, when you’re trying to sell it, saying, ‘I want the bill to pass.’ ” Kelly said she didn’t think Cruz was lying in 2016 about his motives in 2013. But in that case, what he said in 2013 was, as, she put it, acting. And acting, in this context, is just a nicer word for lying. As Sen. Rand Paul noted during Thursday’s exchange:</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text parbase text-9 section"><span>
</span><blockquote>I was there, and I saw the [immigration] debate. I saw Ted Cruz say, “We’ll take citizenship off the table, and then the bill will pass, and I’m for the bill.” … What is particularly insulting, though, is that he is the king of saying, “You’re for amnesty.” Everybody’s for amnesty except for Ted Cruz. But it’s a falseness, and that’s an authenticity problem. </blockquote><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text parbase text-10 section"><span>
</span><p><strong>4. He misleads everyone, not just his enemies. </strong>In the post-debate interview, Kelly noted that in 2013, Cruz had mimicked pro-legalization catchphrases. She told him: “You were talking about people coming ‘out of the shadows.’ It seems like acting.” Cruz told Kelly that he had done this to toy with liberals: “What I often do, particularly when debating Democrats—and I was debating [Sen.] Chuck Schumer there—is use the language of the Democrats, to show their hypocrisy.” Cruz wants conservatives to believe they can trust him because he reserves his deceptions for the left.</p> <span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text-11 text parbase section"><span>
</span><p>But in 2013, Cruz didn’t just put on the act for Democrats. As Sen. Marco Rubio pointed out Thursday, Cruz also dangled the compromise offer in his interview with CBS. One of the clips Kelly played showed Cruz making <a href="http://web.princeton.edu/sites/jmadison/calendar/flash/Cruz.html">a similar pitch</a> to his former professor, Robert George, a leading conservative thinker and activist. Cruz also put on his earnest-compromiser act for conservative journalist <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD6LcVRDK4E">Byron York</a>. In fact, Cruz’s office <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-ted-cruz-opens-up-on-immigration/article/2530773/">requested the interview</a> with York, ostensibly to clear the record. And later, in a June 2013 interview with Rush Limbaugh, Cruz <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/06/19/interview_senator_cruz_on_the_amnesty_bill">bragged about a poll of Texas Hispanics</a> in which he had floated, and found support for, the idea of granting “<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/06/28/ted-cruzs-adversarial-relationship-with-facts/">work permits that do not allow citizenship</a>”—a proposal that Cruz now claims was just a ruse. When you deceive everyone, including voters and fellow conservatives, how can anyone trust you?</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><span>
</span><div class="text-12 text parbase section"><span>
</span><p><strong>5. He refuses to admit having changed his mind.</strong> In Thursday’s debate, Jeb Bush rebuked Rubio for abandoning his support of the 2013 immigration bill. Rubio pleaded, lamely, that he had done so because “the American people”—i.e., Republican voters—turned against the bill. But at least Rubio acknowledged his reversal. What distinguishes Cruz is his refusal to concede that he ever flirted with legalization. As Paul noted Thursday: “I was for legalization. I think, frankly, if you have border security, you can have legalization. So was Ted, but now he says it wasn’t so. That’s not true.” Another candidate on the stage, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, made the same point: “It’s perfectly legal in this country to change your mind. But when you’re a governor, you have to admit it. You can’t hide behind parliamentary tricks.”</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><div class="text-13 text parbase section"><span>
</span><p>In his closing statement, Cruz put the issue squarely: “The central question in this race is trust.” Indeed it is. Cruz is running for president as the candidate you can believe in, the man who says what he means and does what he says. It’s a good slogan. It’s just not true of Cruz.</p><span>
</span></div><span>
</span><span>
</span></div></body></html>
String displayHtml = "<html>\n" +
"<head>\n" +
"<style>\n" +
"img {\n" +
" width: 100%;\n" +
"}\n" +
"</style>"+
"<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes\">\n"+
"</head>\n" +
"<body>\n" +