Java 可供选择的未来行为似乎是;“破碎的”;从Powermock测试执行时
基于,我正在使用ListenableFuture 我正在使用:Java 可供选择的未来行为似乎是;“破碎的”;从Powermock测试执行时,java,guava,easymock,jdeveloper,powermock,Java,Guava,Easymock,Jdeveloper,Powermock,基于,我正在使用ListenableFuture 我正在使用: java 1.6 JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0 番石榴-13.0.1.jar junit-4.5.jar easymock-3.1.jar powermock-easymock-1.4.12-full.jar 我试图确保在异步模式下调用被测试的方法 My Manager.java代码是: 任何想法都将受到欢迎!:) 谢谢 我不确定我是否理解您为什么想在测试代码中睡觉。测试应该快速运行。您从未看到您的“done as
java 1.6
JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0
番石榴-13.0.1.jar
junit-4.5.jar
easymock-3.1.jar
powermock-easymock-1.4.12-full.jar
我试图确保在异步模式下调用被测试的方法 My Manager.java代码是:
任何想法都将受到欢迎!:)
谢谢 我不确定我是否理解您为什么想在测试代码中睡觉。测试应该快速运行。您从未看到您的
“done async”
日志消息吗?@LouisWasserman:我想确保操作是在“async”模式下完成的-这意味着,我不想等待睡眠完成。我只想调用我的方法MyCacheManager.getDetails(…)
,我的测试将退出refreshAsync()
方法。此时,我将知道睡眠是在“并行”线程中完成的,并且不会阻止我的主测试=>test在超时之前完成。但如果测试在超时时失败-我知道线程正在以“同步”方式休眠,只有在完成后我才会从refreshAsync()返回。此外,在实际测试中,我会将超时时间减少到1秒左右-这足以完成“同步”方法,若测试并没有完成,那个么不管日志睡眠时间有多长。@BrianHenry:我确实看到了这条消息,但在“等待5秒结束”之后。所以我认为测试是在“同步”模式下运行的。
...
public synchronized void refreshAsync(final String id) {
m_Log.entry(id);
ListeningExecutorService service =
MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(Executors.newCachedThreadPool());
ListenableFuture<Details> getDetailsTask =
service.submit(new Callable<Details>() {
@Override
public Details call() {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().toString());
return MyCacheManager.getDetails(id);
}
});
Futures.addCallback(getDetailsTask ,
new FutureCallback<Details>() {
// we want this handler to run immediately after we push the big red button!
public void onSuccess(Details details) {
System.out.println("Success");
//TODO: publish event
}
public void onFailure(Throwable thrown) {
System.out.println("Failed");
//TODO: log
}
});
service.shutdown();
m_Log.exit("done async");
}
...
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest( { Manager.class, MyCacheManager.class, TWResourceManager.class, Logger.class })
public class DetailsTests {
{
...
@Test (timeout = 4000)
public void refreshAsync_RequestedInAsyncMode_NoWaitForComplete() throws Exception {
// Creating nice mock - because we are not caring about methods call order
mockStatic(MyCacheManager.class);
// Setup
final int operationTimeMilis = 5000;
expect(MyCacheManager.getDetails(anyObject(String.class))).andStubAnswer(new IAnswer<Details>() {
public Details answer() {
try {
System.out.println("start waiting 5 sec");
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().toString());
Thread.sleep(operationTimeMilis);
System.out.println("finished waiting 5 sec");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return Details.getEmpty();
}
});
replay(MyCacheManager.class);
replayAll();
ISchemaActionsContract controller = new TWManager();
controller.refreshSchemaDetailsAsync("schema_id");
// We need not to verify mocks, since all we are testing is timeout
// verifyAll();
}
}
...
Object res = null;
FutureTask task = new FutureTask(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
MyCacheManager.getDetails(id);
}
}, res);
m_Log.debug("async mode - send request and do not wait for answer.");
Executors.newCachedThreadPool().submit(task);