Warning: file_get_contents(/data/phpspider/zhask/data//catemap/2/unit-testing/4.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 167

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/tag.function.php on line 1116

Notice: Undefined index: in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 180

Warning: array_chunk() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /data/phpspider/zhask/libs/function.php on line 181
Java 使用PowerMock在JUnit套件中共享静态初始化_Java_Unit Testing_Junit_Powermock - Fatal编程技术网

Java 使用PowerMock在JUnit套件中共享静态初始化

Java 使用PowerMock在JUnit套件中共享静态初始化,java,unit-testing,junit,powermock,Java,Unit Testing,Junit,Powermock,我正在为旧Java代码库使用一个大型测试套件。长话短说,它使用DBUnit从本地硬盘上传静态只读数据集。目前,这是在每个测试级别上完成的,这意味着该套件需要花费相当长的时间才能运行 我试图在套件级别共享一个共享的静态类。(我们也没有定义合适的测试套件——我使用 另一个问题是,所有的are测试都使用@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)——所以偶尔会出现类路径问题,这会破坏我认为通常可以解决的问题 这里有一个简单的例子说明什么是不起作用的 测试中的Java代码 代码库中的

我正在为旧Java代码库使用一个大型测试套件。长话短说,它使用DBUnit从本地硬盘上传静态只读数据集。目前,这是在每个测试级别上完成的,这意味着该套件需要花费相当长的时间才能运行

我试图在套件级别共享一个共享的静态类。(我们也没有定义合适的测试套件——我使用

另一个问题是,所有的are测试都使用@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)——所以偶尔会出现类路径问题,这会破坏我认为通常可以解决的问题

这里有一个简单的例子说明什么是不起作用的


测试中的Java代码 代码库中的静态依赖关系

package com.somecorp.proj;
public class SomeDependency {
    public static String getStaticString() {
        // some resource intensive process we don't want running in unit tests
        return "real value";
    }
}
package com.somecorp.proj;

import static org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.SuiteType.RUN_WITH_CLASSES;
import static org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.SuiteType.TEST_CLASSES;

import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite;
import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.BeforeSuite;
import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.ClassnameFilters;
import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.SuiteTypes;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;

import com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization;

@RunWith(ClasspathSuite.class)
@SuiteTypes({RUN_WITH_CLASSES, TEST_CLASSES})
@ClassnameFilters({".*Test.*"})
public class ProjectJUnitSuite {

    @BeforeSuite
    public static void setUpBeforeSuite() {
        StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization.init();
    }

}
测试1下的班级

package com.somecorp.proj;

public class UnderTest {

    public String getIt() {
        return "Here is the value: " + SomeDependency.getStaticString();
    }
}
package com.somecorp.proj;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;

import com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization;

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SomeDependency.class)
public class TestUnderTest {

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(SomeDependency.class);
        PowerMockito.when(SomeDependency.getStaticString()).
            thenReturn(StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization.getTestString());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetIt() {
        UnderTest ut = new UnderTest();
        assertEquals(
            "Here is the value: a test string",
            ut.getIt()
        );
    }
}
测试2下的班级

package com.somecorp.proj;

public class AlsoUnderTest {
    public String getTheThing() {
        return "some other value using it: " + SomeDependency.getStaticString();
    }
}
package com.somecorp.proj;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;

import com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization;

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SomeDependency.class)
public class TestAlsoUnderTest {

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(SomeDependency.class);
        PowerMockito.when(SomeDependency.getStaticString()).
            thenReturn(StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization.getTestString());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetTheThing() {
        AlsoUnderTest ut = new AlsoUnderTest();
        assertEquals(
            "some other value using it: a test string",
            ut.getTheThing()
        );
    }
}

JUnit代码 使用init方法编写代码我只希望在套件运行开始时运行一次

package com.somecorp.proj.testClasses;

public class StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization {

    private static String testString;

    public static void init() {
        // Some expensive stuff
        System.out.println("EXPENSIVE INITIALIZATION");
        testString = "a test string";
    }

    public static String getTestString() {
        return testString;
    }
}
测试1

package com.somecorp.proj;

public class UnderTest {

    public String getIt() {
        return "Here is the value: " + SomeDependency.getStaticString();
    }
}
package com.somecorp.proj;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;

import com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization;

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SomeDependency.class)
public class TestUnderTest {

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(SomeDependency.class);
        PowerMockito.when(SomeDependency.getStaticString()).
            thenReturn(StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization.getTestString());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetIt() {
        UnderTest ut = new UnderTest();
        assertEquals(
            "Here is the value: a test string",
            ut.getIt()
        );
    }
}
测试2

package com.somecorp.proj;

public class AlsoUnderTest {
    public String getTheThing() {
        return "some other value using it: " + SomeDependency.getStaticString();
    }
}
package com.somecorp.proj;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;

import com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization;

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SomeDependency.class)
public class TestAlsoUnderTest {

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(SomeDependency.class);
        PowerMockito.when(SomeDependency.getStaticString()).
            thenReturn(StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization.getTestString());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetTheThing() {
        AlsoUnderTest ut = new AlsoUnderTest();
        assertEquals(
            "some other value using it: a test string",
            ut.getTheThing()
        );
    }
}
测试套件

package com.somecorp.proj;
public class SomeDependency {
    public static String getStaticString() {
        // some resource intensive process we don't want running in unit tests
        return "real value";
    }
}
package com.somecorp.proj;

import static org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.SuiteType.RUN_WITH_CLASSES;
import static org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.SuiteType.TEST_CLASSES;

import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite;
import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.BeforeSuite;
import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.ClassnameFilters;
import org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.SuiteTypes;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;

import com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization;

@RunWith(ClasspathSuite.class)
@SuiteTypes({RUN_WITH_CLASSES, TEST_CLASSES})
@ClassnameFilters({".*Test.*"})
public class ProjectJUnitSuite {

    @BeforeSuite
    public static void setUpBeforeSuite() {
        StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization.init();
    }

}
JAR详细信息

  • powermock-mockito-1.4.12-full.jar
  • mockito-all-1.9.0.jar
  • cpsuite-1.2.6.jar
  • javassist-3.16.1-GA.jar
  • 使用JUnit4.8.1
测试失败的痕迹(明显不是错误-失败)(对于一个测试…第二个测试几乎相同):

org.junit.ComparisonFailure:应为:但为:
位于org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
位于org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
在com.somecorp.proj.TestAlsoUnderTest.testGetTheThing(TestAlsoUnderTest.java:28)
在sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(本机方法)处
位于sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
在sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)中
位于java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:66)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:312)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:86)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runbeforesthentestthenuter(MethodRoadie.java:94)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:296)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:112)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:73)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runbeforesthenTesttheAfter(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:284)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:84)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:49)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.invokeTestMethod(powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.java:209)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.runMethods(powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.java:148)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl$1.run(powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.java:122)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
位于org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.run(powermockjunit44runnerdelegateinpl.java:120)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:102)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:53)
位于org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:42)
位于org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
位于org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
位于org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
位于org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
位于org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
访问org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
位于org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
位于org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
位于org.junit.extensions.cpsuite.ClasspathSuite.run(ClasspathSuite.java:196)
位于org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)
位于org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
位于org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
位于org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
位于org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
位于org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)

如何使此共享静态初始值设定项在每个套件中运行一次,并可从所有启用Powermock的单元测试中引用?

我通过在引用
StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization
的所有测试类上使用
@PowerMockIgnore
注释,使初始化只发生一次

特别是在这种情况下,将下面的注释添加到两个JUnit测试类就可以了

@PowerMockIgnore("com.somecorp.proj.testClasses.StaticTestClassRequiringInitialization")
我以前试过这个,但没有成功