Redux 在域之间共享操作
通常我使用redux saga,但目前我需要redux thunk。我在模块化结构中使用ducks,例如,现在我有两个ducks:Redux 在域之间共享操作,redux,redux-thunk,Redux,Redux Thunk,通常我使用redux saga,但目前我需要redux thunk。我在模块化结构中使用ducks,例如,现在我有两个ducks:auth和user,具有以下异步操作: auth duck.js register(credentials) { return dispatch => { dispatch(actions.registerRequest()); return service.requestRegister(credentials)
auth
和user
,具有以下异步操作:
auth duck.js
register(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(actions.registerRequest());
return service.requestRegister(credentials)
.then((response) => {
dispatch(actions.registerSuccess(...));
// Here I need to dispatch some action from user-duck.js
})
.catch(() => dispatch(actions.registerError(...)))
}
}
fetchUser() {
return dispatch => {...}
}
_onSubmit() {
this.props.register().then(() => this.props.fetchUser);
}
import {actions as authActions} from './auth-duck.js';
import {actions as userActions} from './user-duck.js';
export function doLogin(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
return dispatch(authAction.login(credentials)).then(
() => dispatch(userActions.fetchUser())
);
}
}
用户duck.js
register(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(actions.registerRequest());
return service.requestRegister(credentials)
.then((response) => {
dispatch(actions.registerSuccess(...));
// Here I need to dispatch some action from user-duck.js
})
.catch(() => dispatch(actions.registerError(...)))
}
}
fetchUser() {
return dispatch => {...}
}
_onSubmit() {
this.props.register().then(() => this.props.fetchUser);
}
import {actions as authActions} from './auth-duck.js';
import {actions as userActions} from './user-duck.js';
export function doLogin(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
return dispatch(authAction.login(credentials)).then(
() => dispatch(userActions.fetchUser())
);
}
}
我真的不知道怎样才能不把这两个模块搞得一团糟,在成功注册后分派fetchUser
我可以将register
结果(例如令牌或其他东西)返回到容器中,然后使用链接调度fetchUser
AuthContainer.js
register(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(actions.registerRequest());
return service.requestRegister(credentials)
.then((response) => {
dispatch(actions.registerSuccess(...));
// Here I need to dispatch some action from user-duck.js
})
.catch(() => dispatch(actions.registerError(...)))
}
}
fetchUser() {
return dispatch => {...}
}
_onSubmit() {
this.props.register().then(() => this.props.fetchUser);
}
import {actions as authActions} from './auth-duck.js';
import {actions as userActions} from './user-duck.js';
export function doLogin(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
return dispatch(authAction.login(credentials)).then(
() => dispatch(userActions.fetchUser())
);
}
}
但我不知道这是用redux thunk管理此类业务的最佳方式吗 经过长时间的搜索,我找到了两种方法来共享来自不同域的逻辑。 第一个是使用
mapDispatchToProps
(谢谢@DonovanM),如下所示:
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
login: (credentials) => {
return dispatch(authActions.login(credentials)).then(
() => dispatch(userActions.fetchUser())
);
}
}
}
login
函数返回Promise
这就是为什么我们可以将它链接到另一个函数
和第二个可能选项:
在我们的例子中使用类似于“桥”的文件,它是app sagas.js
register(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(actions.registerRequest());
return service.requestRegister(credentials)
.then((response) => {
dispatch(actions.registerSuccess(...));
// Here I need to dispatch some action from user-duck.js
})
.catch(() => dispatch(actions.registerError(...)))
}
}
fetchUser() {
return dispatch => {...}
}
_onSubmit() {
this.props.register().then(() => this.props.fetchUser);
}
import {actions as authActions} from './auth-duck.js';
import {actions as userActions} from './user-duck.js';
export function doLogin(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
return dispatch(authAction.login(credentials)).then(
() => dispatch(userActions.fetchUser())
);
}
}
应用程序duck.js
register(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(actions.registerRequest());
return service.requestRegister(credentials)
.then((response) => {
dispatch(actions.registerSuccess(...));
// Here I need to dispatch some action from user-duck.js
})
.catch(() => dispatch(actions.registerError(...)))
}
}
fetchUser() {
return dispatch => {...}
}
_onSubmit() {
this.props.register().then(() => this.props.fetchUser);
}
import {actions as authActions} from './auth-duck.js';
import {actions as userActions} from './user-duck.js';
export function doLogin(credentials) {
return dispatch => {
return dispatch(authAction.login(credentials)).then(
() => dispatch(userActions.fetchUser())
);
}
}
在第二种情况下,我们可以将所有逻辑放在ducks中,避免在容器中传播逻辑。但是我想这两种方法可以结合使用。没有规则thunks只能发出一个HTTP请求。如果您需要在登录后获取用户,请获取它
const login = credentials => dispatch => {
fetchLogin(credentials).then(() => {
dispatch({ type: "LoginSuccess" })
return fetchUser()
}).then(() => {
dispatch({ type: "UserFetched" })
})
}
如果要重用用户获取操作,请从thunk发送thunk
const fetchCurrentUser = login => dispatch => {
return fetchUser(login.userId).then(user => {
dispatch({ type: "UserLoad" })
return user
})
}
const login = credentials => dispatch => {
return fetchLogin(credentials).then(login => {
dispatch({ type: "LoginSuccess" })
return dispatch(fetchCurrentUser(login))
}
}
在我的一个应用程序中,我在成功登录后调用7个action thunks 只要提交的
\u onSubmit
在将来不会变得更复杂,这似乎没问题。不过,我个人可能会将这种逻辑放在mapDispatchToProps
中。这样,您的组件就不必知道任何有关操作的信息。@DonovanM是的,您是对的,mapDispatchToProps
比组件中的方法更好谢谢@AJcodez的回答。鸭子的想法是拥有独立的模块,以提供松散耦合。所以,登录鸭不能知道任何关于用户鸭。