C 准备就绪时不会读取命名管道。(它在gdb内部工作)
2014年12月20日更新:此问题已解决,请参阅问题底部的工作代码 设计 有四个客户端处理一些数据,然后通过命名管道FIFO将其传递给服务器进程 问题 当在gdb之外运行服务器时,不进入gdb也会出现同样的问题,只读取一个管道。Select返回1,FD_ISSET仅对一个管道作出反应,并且在执行期间保持同一管道 查看/proc/[PID]/{fd,fdinfo}会发现其他管道仍处于打开状态,尚未读取。fdinfo中的pos字段为0 问题 我需要更改什么以交错方式读取所有四个管道 测验 为了模拟客户端,我使用一个12字节的随机文件,该文件被传输到命名管道上 随机文件是通过以下方式生成的:C 准备就绪时不会读取命名管道。(它在gdb内部工作),c,unix,pipe,named-pipes,fifo,C,Unix,Pipe,Named Pipes,Fifo,2014年12月20日更新:此问题已解决,请参阅问题底部的工作代码 设计 有四个客户端处理一些数据,然后通过命名管道FIFO将其传递给服务器进程 问题 当在gdb之外运行服务器时,不进入gdb也会出现同样的问题,只读取一个管道。Select返回1,FD_ISSET仅对一个管道作出反应,并且在执行期间保持同一管道 查看/proc/[PID]/{fd,fdinfo}会发现其他管道仍处于打开状态,尚未读取。fdinfo中的pos字段为0 问题 我需要更改什么以交错方式读取所有四个管道 测验 为了模拟客
dd if=/dev/urandom of=test.bin bs=1024 count=$((1024*12))
然后在单独的终端中按以下顺序执行
terminal 1:
./server.out
terminal 2:
cat test.bin > d0
terminal 3:
cat test.bin > d1
terminal 4:
cat test.bin > d2
terminal 5:
cat test.bin > d3
生成文件
来源
这些客户端称为加密狗
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#define NR_OF_DONGLES 4
int do_something(int fd);
int main()
{
fd_set read_fd_set;
FD_ZERO(&read_fd_set);
int dongles[NR_OF_DONGLES];
/*Create FIFO */
for(int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++)
{
char name[255];
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "d%d", i);
if(mkfifo(name, 0666) == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to create fifo %s \t Error: %s", name, name);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
int dongle = open(name, O_RDONLY);
if(dongle > 0)
{
fprintf(stderr,"set dongle %s\n", name);
FD_SET(dongle, &read_fd_set);
dongles[i] = dongle;
}
else
{
fprintf(stderr, "failed to open: %s\nerror: %s\n", name, strerror(errno));
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
int closed = 0;
int isset[NR_OF_DONGLES];
memset(isset, 0, sizeof(isset));
while(closed < NR_OF_DONGLES)
{
int active;
if((active = select (FD_SETSIZE , &read_fd_set, NULL,NULL,NULL)) < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "select failed\n errno: %s\n",strerror(errno));
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
fprintf(stderr, "active devices %i\n", active);
for(int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; ++i)
{
int dongle = dongles[i];
if(FD_ISSET(dongle, &read_fd_set))
{
isset[i] += 1;
int size = do_something(dongle);
fprintf(stderr, "round %i \tdongle %i \tread %i bytes\n", isset[i],i, size);
if(size == 0)
{
if(close(dongle) == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr,"Could not close dongle %i\nError: %s\n",
i,strerror(errno));
}
closed += 1;
fprintf(stderr, "closed dongle %i \t number of closed dongles %i\n",
i, closed);
FD_CLR(dongle, &read_fd_set);
}
}
}
}
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
#define BLOCK_SIZE (8*1024)
/*
* If the size is zero we reached the end of the file and it can be closed
*/
int do_something(int fd)
{
int8_t buffer[BLOCK_SIZE];
ssize_t size = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
if(size > 0)
{
//Process read data
}
else if(size == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr, "reading dongle failed\nerrno: %s", strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
return size;
}
您可以尝试在Solaris上通过strace truss运行代码,在FreeBSD上通过ktrace/kdump运行代码。对我来说,它只在opend0上暂停。因此,服务器不会在cat创建其他管道之前创建所有管道 我的狗。。。打开后不正确:如果失败,打开返回-1,而不是0 因此,我认为您的程序无法处理您希望只正确打开一个管道的文件
还有一个问题与选择使用有关。在每次调用select之前,您应该重新初始化read_fd_set,因为在每次调用select后,只有描述符保留了标记数据,其他描述符则被清除。经过一些修改,我得到了它。在我的MacOSX open上。。。直到FIFO上有东西出现时才会停止。考虑下面的程序;只要您开始将数据馈送到d0、d1等中,它就会工作。但在此之前,该程序的输出仅为:
Creating dongle d0
Creating dongle d1
Creating dongle d2
Creating dongle d3
Opening dongle d0
所以我打开了open的主页,你瞧,有一个非Block的旗帜。添加了这些代码后,下面的代码就像一个符咒。仅供参考,POSIX并没有说打开FIFO应该被阻止,但我发现了一些实现所做的评论
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#define NR_OF_DONGLES 4
#define BLOCK_SIZE (8*1024)
// Prints error and stops program
int error(char const *fmt, ...) {
va_list args;
va_start(args, fmt);
vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
exit(1);
}
// Alternative for printf() that flushes stdout
void msg(char const *fmt, ...) {
va_list args;
va_start(args, fmt);
vprintf(fmt, args);
fflush(stdout);
}
// Reads an open readable fd
int do_something(int fd) {
int8_t buffer[BLOCK_SIZE];
ssize_t size = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
if(size > 0)
msg("Got data from fd %d, length %ld\n", fd, size);
else if (size == -1)
error("Reading dongle fd %d failed: %s\n", fd, strerror(errno));
else
msg("Dongle with fd %d signals EOF\n", fd);
return size;
}
int main() {
int dongles[NR_OF_DONGLES];
// Create the dongles, open, add to list of open fd's
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++) {
char name[255];
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "d%d", i);
msg("Creating dongle %s\n", name);
if (mkfifo(name, 0666) == -1 && errno != EEXIST)
error("Failed to create fifo %s: %s\n", name, strerror(errno));
}
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++) {
char name[255];
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "d%d", i);
msg("Opening dongle %s\n", name);
/* ****************************************
* Here it is, first test was with
* int fd = open(name, O_RDONLY);
* which blocked at the open() call
*******************************************/
int fd = open(name, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd < 0)
error("Cannot open dongle %s: %s\n", name, strerror(errno));
dongles[i] = fd;
}
int closed = 0;
while (closed < NR_OF_DONGLES) {
msg("Closed dongles so far: %d\n", closed);
// Add dongle fd's to select set, unless the fd is already closed
// which is indicated by fd == -1
fd_set read_fd_set;
FD_ZERO(&read_fd_set);
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++)
if (dongles[i] > 0)
FD_SET(dongles[i], &read_fd_set);
// Wait for readable fd's
int active;
if ( (active = select (FD_SETSIZE , &read_fd_set, 0, 0, 0)) < 0 )
error("Select failure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
msg("Active dongles: %d\n", active);
for (int fd = 0; fd < FD_SETSIZE; fd++)
if (FD_ISSET(fd, &read_fd_set)) {
msg("Fd %d is readable\n", fd);
int size = do_something(fd);
if (!size) {
// Fd signals EOF. Close dongle, remove from array
// of open fd's by setting to -1
msg("Fd %d signals EOF\n", fd);
if (close(fd) < 0)
error("Failure to close fd %d: %s\n",
fd, strerror(errno));
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++)
if (dongles[i] == fd)
dongles[i] = 0;
// Update closed fd counter
closed++;
}
}
}
exit(0);
}
你有设计,有问题,有测试。。。问题在哪里?首先,好的捕获,打开的检查确实是错误的。不幸的是,问题仍然存在,它没有返回-1。第二,关于战略的好建议。我没有试着用strace调试它。遗憾的是,它没有给我任何额外的信息。对我来说,它没有挂起d0,而是暂停,因为它正在d0 cat test.bin>d0上等待编写器。读取的管道通常是d0或d1,有时是其他管道中的一个,因此读取的管道并不总是相同的。@Henk,你说得对。存在与选择相关的问题。答案已更新。这是关于FIFO打开的:如果O_NONBLOCK是清除的,则只用于读取的打开将阻止调用线程,直到线程打开文件进行写入。仅用于写入的open将阻止调用线程,直到线程打开文件进行读取。因此,它肯定会阻塞,直到FIFO被打开写入。但它不应该阻塞,直到有东西被实际写入。如果编写器只是打开,然后在一段时间内什么也不做,那么读者的打开应该会成功,然后阅读将被阻止。@WumpusQ.Wumbley-是的,我也希望看到它。希望看到它吗?unix上一直都是这样。如果你认为MacOS X不符合我写的,我怀疑你误解了什么。进程可以在非阻塞模式下打开FIFO。在这种情况下,即使写端还没有人打开,只读打开也会成功,如果ENXIO没有这样的设备或地址,则只读打开会失败,除非另一端已经打开。从:,Linux fifo7手册页。因此,在这种情况下,如果在写入之前先打开读取,则需要非阻塞模式。看起来我们在同一页上,重新阅读后,MacOSX和Linux的行为类似。
Creating dongle d0
Creating dongle d1
Creating dongle d2
Creating dongle d3
Opening dongle d0
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#define NR_OF_DONGLES 4
#define BLOCK_SIZE (8*1024)
// Prints error and stops program
int error(char const *fmt, ...) {
va_list args;
va_start(args, fmt);
vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
exit(1);
}
// Alternative for printf() that flushes stdout
void msg(char const *fmt, ...) {
va_list args;
va_start(args, fmt);
vprintf(fmt, args);
fflush(stdout);
}
// Reads an open readable fd
int do_something(int fd) {
int8_t buffer[BLOCK_SIZE];
ssize_t size = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
if(size > 0)
msg("Got data from fd %d, length %ld\n", fd, size);
else if (size == -1)
error("Reading dongle fd %d failed: %s\n", fd, strerror(errno));
else
msg("Dongle with fd %d signals EOF\n", fd);
return size;
}
int main() {
int dongles[NR_OF_DONGLES];
// Create the dongles, open, add to list of open fd's
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++) {
char name[255];
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "d%d", i);
msg("Creating dongle %s\n", name);
if (mkfifo(name, 0666) == -1 && errno != EEXIST)
error("Failed to create fifo %s: %s\n", name, strerror(errno));
}
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++) {
char name[255];
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "d%d", i);
msg("Opening dongle %s\n", name);
/* ****************************************
* Here it is, first test was with
* int fd = open(name, O_RDONLY);
* which blocked at the open() call
*******************************************/
int fd = open(name, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd < 0)
error("Cannot open dongle %s: %s\n", name, strerror(errno));
dongles[i] = fd;
}
int closed = 0;
while (closed < NR_OF_DONGLES) {
msg("Closed dongles so far: %d\n", closed);
// Add dongle fd's to select set, unless the fd is already closed
// which is indicated by fd == -1
fd_set read_fd_set;
FD_ZERO(&read_fd_set);
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++)
if (dongles[i] > 0)
FD_SET(dongles[i], &read_fd_set);
// Wait for readable fd's
int active;
if ( (active = select (FD_SETSIZE , &read_fd_set, 0, 0, 0)) < 0 )
error("Select failure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
msg("Active dongles: %d\n", active);
for (int fd = 0; fd < FD_SETSIZE; fd++)
if (FD_ISSET(fd, &read_fd_set)) {
msg("Fd %d is readable\n", fd);
int size = do_something(fd);
if (!size) {
// Fd signals EOF. Close dongle, remove from array
// of open fd's by setting to -1
msg("Fd %d signals EOF\n", fd);
if (close(fd) < 0)
error("Failure to close fd %d: %s\n",
fd, strerror(errno));
for (int i = 0; i < NR_OF_DONGLES; i++)
if (dongles[i] == fd)
dongles[i] = 0;
// Update closed fd counter
closed++;
}
}
}
exit(0);
}