替换声明类型的C#方法,该方法实现接口并从基继承
为了单元测试遗留代码,我试图在运行时交换方法的内容。我一直在研究这些答案 这是我到目前为止所拥有的完整代码示例替换声明类型的C#方法,该方法实现接口并从基继承,c#,unit-testing,pointers,virtual,unsafe,C#,Unit Testing,Pointers,Virtual,Unsafe,为了单元测试遗留代码,我试图在运行时交换方法的内容。我一直在研究这些答案 这是我到目前为止所拥有的完整代码示例 using System; using System.Diagnostics; using System.Reflection; using System.Runtime.CompilerServices; namespace Foo.Bar { public interface IFoo { string Apple(); } pub
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
namespace Foo.Bar {
public interface IFoo {
string Apple();
}
public class Bar {
protected virtual object One() {
return null;
}
protected virtual object Two() {
return null;
}
protected virtual object Three() {
return null;
}
/* Uncomment this to generate a null reference */
//protected virtual object Four() {
// return null;
//}
}
public class Foo : Bar, IFoo {
public string Apple() {
return "Apple";
}
public string Orange() {
return "Orange";
}
/* Uncommenting this fixes the null reference */
//public override int GetHashCode() {
// throw new NotImplementedException();
//}
public void ReplaceMethod(Delegate targetMethod, Delegate replacementMethod) {
MethodInfo methodToReplace = targetMethod.Method;
MethodInfo methodToInject = replacementMethod.Method;
RuntimeHelpers.PrepareMethod(methodToReplace.MethodHandle);
RuntimeHelpers.PrepareMethod(methodToInject.MethodHandle);
if (methodToReplace.IsVirtual)
ReplaceVirtualInner(methodToReplace, methodToInject);
else
ReplaceStandard(methodToReplace, methodToInject);
}
private void ReplaceStandard(MethodInfo methodToReplace, MethodInfo methodToInject) {
IntPtr targetPtr = methodToInject.MethodHandle.Value;
IntPtr replacePtr = methodToReplace.MethodHandle.Value;
unsafe
{
if (IntPtr.Size == 4) {
int* inj = (int*)replacePtr.ToPointer() + 2;
int* tar = (int*)targetPtr.ToPointer() + 2;
if (Debugger.IsAttached) {
byte* injInst = (byte*)*inj;
byte* tarInst = (byte*)*tar;
int* injSrc = (int*)(injInst + 1);
int* tarSrc = (int*)(tarInst + 1);
*tarSrc = (((int)injInst + 5) + *injSrc) - ((int)tarInst + 5);
}
else {
*tar = *inj;
}
}
else {
long* inj = (long*)replacePtr.ToPointer() + 1;
long* tar = (long*)targetPtr.ToPointer() + 1;
if (Debugger.IsAttached) {
byte* injInst = (byte*)*inj;
byte* tarInst = (byte*)*tar;
long* injSrc = (long*)(injInst + 1);
long* tarSrc = (long*)(tarInst + 1);
*tarSrc = (((long)injInst + 5) + *injSrc) - ((long)tarInst + 5);
}
else {
*tar = *inj;
}
}
}
}
private void ReplaceVirtualInner(MethodInfo methodToReplace, MethodInfo methodToInject) {
unsafe
{
UInt64* methodDesc = (UInt64*)(methodToReplace.MethodHandle.Value.ToPointer());
int index = (int)(((*methodDesc) >> 32) & 0xFF);
if (IntPtr.Size == 4) {
uint* classStart = (uint*)methodToReplace.DeclaringType.TypeHandle.Value.ToPointer();
classStart += 10;
classStart = (uint*)*classStart;
uint* tar = classStart + index;
uint* inj = (uint*)methodToInject.MethodHandle.Value.ToPointer() + 2;
if (Debugger.IsAttached) {
byte* injInst = (byte*)*inj;
byte* tarInst = (byte*)*tar;
uint* injSrc = (uint*)(injInst + 1);
uint* tarSrc = (uint*)(tarInst + 1);
*tarSrc = (((uint)injInst + 5) + *injSrc) - ((uint)tarInst + 5);
}
else {
*tar = *inj;
}
}
else {
ulong* classStart = (ulong*)methodToReplace.DeclaringType.TypeHandle.Value.ToPointer();
classStart += 8;
classStart = (ulong*)*classStart;
ulong* tar = classStart + index;
ulong* inj = (ulong*)methodToInject.MethodHandle.Value.ToPointer() + 1;
if (Debugger.IsAttached) {
byte* injInst = (byte*)*inj;
byte* tarInst = (byte*)*tar;
ulong* injSrc = (ulong*)(injInst + 1);
ulong* tarSrc = (ulong*)(tarInst + 1);
*tarSrc = (((ulong)injInst + 5) + *injSrc) - ((ulong)tarInst + 5);
}
else {
*tar = *inj;
}
}
}
}
}
}
用法
Foo.Bar.Foo foo = new Foo.Bar.Foo();
foo.ReplaceMethod(
((Func<string>)foo.Apple),
((Func<string>)foo.Orange)
);
var result = foo.Apple(); // this is "Orange" :)
代码是有效的,然而,这里是事情变得奇怪的地方;如果基类(目标方法的声明类型)有3个以上的虚拟方法,实现了一个接口并且没有覆盖任何方法,则会引发NullReferenceException
请问,有人能解释一下发生了什么并帮助我对代码有更深入的理解吗?您所问的实际上是typemock单元测试框架中的一个功能,它允许您在一行简单的代码中将模拟方法的实现更改为另一个,例如:
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
var real = new Foo();
Isolate.WhenCalled(() => real.Apple()).DoInstead(x => { return real.Orange(); });
Assert.AreEqual("Orange", real.Apple());
}
您可以了解有关此功能的更多信息。因为您是为了单元测试而这样做的,所以我将研究Microsoft Fakes框架。您也可以这样做,而无需操作指针。此外,AFAIC您要替换的方法的大小必须与您要替换的方法的内存大小相匹配。@zaitsman这看起来非常有用,不幸的是,它似乎需要Visual Studio Enterprise的时间才能取出乞讨碗
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
var real = new Foo();
Isolate.WhenCalled(() => real.Apple()).DoInstead(x => { return real.Orange(); });
Assert.AreEqual("Orange", real.Apple());
}