Performance Log4J意外的性能提高
在将日志打包到一个单独的类中时,我们体验到了性能的提高,这是我们无法解释的 如果有人可以发表评论来帮助我们理解这一点 这里是主线:Performance Log4J意外的性能提高,performance,log4j,Performance,Log4j,在将日志打包到一个单独的类中时,我们体验到了性能的提高,这是我们无法解释的 如果有人可以发表评论来帮助我们理解这一点 这里是主线: package myapp; import myapp.logging.Log; import org.apache.log4j.Logger; public class ApplicationMain extends Thread { private static Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger(ApplicationMain.c
package myapp;
import myapp.logging.Log;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
public class ApplicationMain extends Thread {
private static Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger(ApplicationMain.class);
@Override
public void run() {
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
try {
Thread.sleep(500);
//traditional plain log4j
long startTime = System.nanoTime();
LOG.info("Hello World Log4j");
long endTime = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(endTime - startTime);
//logging in wrapper
long startTime2 = System.nanoTime();
Log.Info("Hello World Log4J from within wrapper");
long endTime2 = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println(endTime2 - startTime2);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
Log.Info(ex.getMessage());
}
}
}
package myapp.logging;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
public class Log {
private static Logger LOG;
public static synchronized void Info(String LogMessage) {
Throwable throwable = new Throwable();
StackTraceElement[] stackTraceElements = throwable.getStackTrace();
LOG = Logger.getLogger(stackTraceElements[1].getClassName());
LOG.info(LogMessage);
}
}
在Thread.start()
上,我们得到以下类型的输出:
2013-01-02 10:42:25,359 INFO [ApplicationMain] Hello World Log4j
191478
2013-01-02 10:42:25,359 INFO [ApplicationMain] Hello World Log4J from within wrapper
163852
2013-01-02 10:42:25,859 INFO [ApplicationMain] Hello World Log4j
166165
2013-01-02 10:42:25,859 INFO [ApplicationMain] Hello World Log4J from within wrapper
85361
2013-01-02 10:42:26,359 INFO [ApplicationMain] Hello World Log4j
188694
2013-01-02 10:42:26,359 INFO [ApplicationMain] Hello World Log4J from within wrapper
82709
.....
为什么包装器执行直接调用?尽管检索调用方类名会增加额外的开销,但我强烈建议大家阅读微基准测试。这是一个非常有趣的话题,我发现这个问题作为一个起点很有用: 本质上,这不是一个有效的性能度量,因为主要围绕编译器优化需要考虑一大堆其他的事情