基于层次结构和平面维度的分层报表MDX查询

基于层次结构和平面维度的分层报表MDX查询,mdx,olap,olap-cube,Mdx,Olap,Olap Cube,我的目标是基于OLAP多维数据集上的MDX查询获取分组报告。 报告应按层次维度位置和平面维度类别分组。 作为一名新手,我努力编写正确的MDX查询以获得预期结果: 欧洲(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 瑞士(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

我的目标是基于OLAP多维数据集上的MDX查询获取分组报告。 报告应按层次维度位置和平面维度类别分组。 作为一名新手,我努力编写正确的MDX查询以获得预期结果:

  • 欧洲(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
    • 瑞士(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:64
      • 伯尔尼(地点)\总数:39
        • 鞋类(类别)\总数:14
        • T恤(类别)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:13
        • 裤子(类别)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:12
      • 苏黎世(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:25
        • 鞋类(类别)\总数:15
        • T恤(类别)\总共:10件
    • 德国(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:20
      • 柏林(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:5
        • 鞋类(类别)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:5
      • 波恩(地点)\总数:15
        • T恤(类别)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:15
  • 澳大利亚(位置)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
    • Sidney(地点)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
      • T恤(类别)\总数:20
      • 裤子(类别)\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu总数:10

我知道T-SQL语法,但MDX对我来说是全新的。任何样品和想法如何写查询感谢

这样的事情可以让你开始:

select HIERARCHIZE(Location.Continent-Country-City.MEMBERS) 
       * Category.Category.MEMBERS ON 1,
Measures.[Total] ON 0
FROM [YourCube]

您尝试过什么mdx?这个问题实际上与sql中的问题类似。如何在下面的
SELECT*FROM
中指定列和行?您做过任何研究吗?谢谢!结果几乎就是我所需要的。只是想知道,是否是通过设计,类别组将在所有位置级别重复?有没有一种方法可以将类别组放在最低的位置级别上?这当然可以实现,但没有简单的方法可以做到。我宁愿在前端/报告服务中处理这个问题。@SouravA很乐意提供额外的信息-但是为什么要费心于
层次化(
?我听说有些报告工具没有保持层次结构完整。这只是一个预防措施。此外,昨天在SO的另一个问题上,它被#1 MDX大师在这里;=)使用了@苏拉瓦试试这个,它更具挑战性(!):