C++ 比较常规选择和准备好的选择性能

我尝试使用prepared select从mysql获取数据，因为我认为这比常规select更快

这是select语法：

char *sql = "select id,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5 from pricelist where d1 > ? limit 1000000";

该id、d2、d3类型

无符号int

和其他

\uu int64

我编写了我的代码，准备如下：

stmt = mysql_stmt_init(conn);
mysql_stmt_prepare(stmt, sql, strlen(sql));

// Select
param[0].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
param[0].buffer         = (void *) &myId;
param[0].is_unsigned    = 1;
param[0].is_null        = 0;
param[0].length         = 0;

// Result


result[0].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
result[0].buffer         = (void *) &id;
result[0].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[0].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[0].length         = 0;

result[1].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONGLONG;
result[1].buffer         = (void *) &d1;
result[1].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[1].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[1].length         = 0;

result[2].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
result[2].buffer         = (void *) &d2;
result[2].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[2].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[2].length         = 0;

result[3].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
result[3].buffer         = (void *) &d3;
result[3].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[3].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[3].length         = 0;

result[4].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONGLONG;
result[4].buffer         = (void *) &d4;
result[4].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[4].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[4].length         = 0;

result[5].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONGLONG;
result[5].buffer         = (void *) &d5;
result[5].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[5].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[5].length         = 0;

mysql_stmt_bind_param(stmt, param);
mysql_stmt_bind_result(stmt, result);
mysql_stmt_execute(stmt);
mysql_stmt_store_result(stmt);
while(mysql_stmt_fetch (stmt) == 0){
}

mysql_query(conn,"select id ,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5 from pricebook where us > 12 limit 1000000")
result = mysql_use_result(conn); 
while (mysql_fetch_row(result)){
}

我的reqular select代码如下：

stmt = mysql_stmt_init(conn);
mysql_stmt_prepare(stmt, sql, strlen(sql));

// Select
param[0].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
param[0].buffer         = (void *) &myId;
param[0].is_unsigned    = 1;
param[0].is_null        = 0;
param[0].length         = 0;

// Result


result[0].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
result[0].buffer         = (void *) &id;
result[0].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[0].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[0].length         = 0;

result[1].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONGLONG;
result[1].buffer         = (void *) &d1;
result[1].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[1].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[1].length         = 0;

result[2].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
result[2].buffer         = (void *) &d2;
result[2].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[2].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[2].length         = 0;

result[3].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONG;
result[3].buffer         = (void *) &d3;
result[3].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[3].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[3].length         = 0;

result[4].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONGLONG;
result[4].buffer         = (void *) &d4;
result[4].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[4].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[4].length         = 0;

result[5].buffer_type     = MYSQL_TYPE_LONGLONG;
result[5].buffer         = (void *) &d5;
result[5].is_unsigned    = 1;
result[5].is_null         = &is_null[0];
result[5].length         = 0;

mysql_stmt_bind_param(stmt, param);
mysql_stmt_bind_result(stmt, result);
mysql_stmt_execute(stmt);
mysql_stmt_store_result(stmt);
while(mysql_stmt_fetch (stmt) == 0){
}

mysql_query(conn,"select id ,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5 from pricebook where us > 12 limit 1000000")
result = mysql_use_result(conn); 
while (mysql_fetch_row(result)){
}

我在远程pc上运行这两个函数，并检查每个函数的时间段，两个函数的持续时间都等于6秒 当我检查pcap文件时，我看到发送给prepared的vol和reqular查询是相同的，即使是在prepared comperes数据中

$ capinfos prepared.pcap regular.pcap
File name:           prepared.pcap
File type:           Wireshark - pcapng
File encapsulation:  Ethernet
Packet size limit:   file hdr: (not set)
Number of packets:   40 k
File size:           53 MB
Data size:           52 MB
Capture duration:    6 seconds
Start time:          Thu Aug 22 09:41:54 2013
End time:            Thu Aug 22 09:42:00 2013
Data byte rate:      8820 kBps
Data bit rate:       70 Mbps
Average packet size: 1278.63 bytes
Average packet rate: 6898 packets/sec
SHA1:                959e589b090e3354d275f122a6fe6fbcac2351df
RIPEMD160:           7db6a437535d78023579cf3426c4d88d8ff3ddc3
MD5:                 888729dc4c09baf736df22ef34bffeda
Strict time order:   True

File name:           regular.pcap
File type:           Wireshark - pcapng
File encapsulation:  Ethernet
Packet size limit:   file hdr: (not set)
Number of packets:   38 k
File size:           50 MB
Data size:           49 MB
Capture duration:    6 seconds
Start time:          Thu Aug 22 09:41:05 2013
End time:            Thu Aug 22 09:41:11 2013
Data byte rate:      7740 kBps
Data bit rate:       61 Mbps
Average packet size: 1268.65 bytes
Average packet rate: 6101 packets/sec
SHA1:                badf2040d826e6b0cca089211ee559a7c8a29181
RIPEMD160:           68f3bb5d4fcfd640f2da9764ff8e9891745d4800
MD5:                 4ab73a02889472dfe04ed7901976a48c
Strict time order:   True

如果这个确定，持续时间是相同的，或者我不使用准备好的选择以及

我怎样才能改进它

---

谢谢。

数据库服务器以相同的速度执行准备好的语句和常规语句。当您使用不同的参数执行同一个查询时，性能就会有所不同：一个prepared语句被解析并准备执行一次，然后可以使用不同的参数廉价地执行，而一个常规语句在每次执行时都必须被解析