datetime.now()的Python解析
我正在测试datetime.now()的Python解析,python,windows,datetime,python-3.4,Python,Windows,Datetime,Python 3.4,我正在测试datetime.now()的分辨率。因为它假定输出为微秒,所以我希望每个打印都会不同 然而,我总是得到这样的东西 from datetime import datetime import time for i in range(1000): curr_time = datetime.now() print(curr_time) time.sleep(0.0001) 为什么会这样?有没有什么方法可以让我得到精确到微秒的时间戳?事实上我不需要微秒,但是如果能得
datetime.now()的分辨率。因为它假定输出为微秒,所以我希望每个打印都会不同
然而,我总是得到这样的东西
from datetime import datetime
import time
for i in range(1000):
curr_time = datetime.now()
print(curr_time)
time.sleep(0.0001)
为什么会这样?有没有什么方法可以让我得到精确到微秒的时间戳?事实上我不需要微秒,但是如果能得到0.1ms的分辨率就好了
==更新====
我将其与使用time.perf_counter()和添加到起始datetime
从datetime导入datetime,timedelta
导入时间
...
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
...
我不确定它到底有多“准确”,但分辨率至少更高。。。。这似乎并不重要,因为我的电脑甚至不能以这么高的速度打印。对于我的目的,我只是需要不同的时间戳来区分不同的条目,这对我来说已经足够好了
datetime0 = datetime.now()
t0 = time.perf_counter()
for i in range(1000):
print('datetime.now(): ', datetime.now())
print('time.perf_counter(): ', datetime0 + timedelta(0, time.perf_counter()-t0))
print('\n')
time.sleep(0.000001)
这可能是系统上的时间限制。sleep
,而不是datetime.now()
。。。或者两者兼而有之您运行的是什么操作系统,Python的版本和发行版是什么?
您的系统可能无法提供time.sleep
文档中提到的“亚秒精度”:
...
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010352
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010545
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010745
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.010961
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011155
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011369
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011596
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.011829
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012026
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012232
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012424
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012619
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.012844
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013044
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013242
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013437
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013638
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.013903
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014125
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014328
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014526
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014721
datetime.now(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.015381
time.perf_counter(): 2015-07-10 23:24:18.014919
...
在装有CPython 2.7的amd64上的Linux 3.x上,我得到了一些非常接近您预期的0.0001时间步的结果:
sleep(...)
sleep(seconds)
Delay execution for a given number of seconds. The argument may be
a floating point number for subsecond precision.
我相信这取决于操作系统时钟,而操作系统时钟通常没有那么精确。时间戳的最大分辨率将取决于时间源的最大分辨率。我明白了。我正在使用Windows8。它的分辨率似乎是1ms。我想,在操作系统的情况下,没有办法超越这一点?如果你这样做会怎么样?我使用的是Windows8和Python34。我认为这是datetime.now()的问题。我试过计时。似乎每个循环都显示不同的时间。可能我需要将time.clock()中的值转换为datetime。很高兴知道。我建议如果还没有的话@tuzzer:datetime.now()
具有微秒精度()--请检查.resolution
属性。它没有提到在Windows()上可能是10毫秒到55毫秒(ms==毫秒)的精度。看见
2015-07-10 19:58:24.353711
2015-07-10 19:58:24.353879
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354052
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354227
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354401
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354577
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354757
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354938